OH Pike County: 8 in Rhoden Family Murdered Over Custody Issue, 4 Members Wagner Family Arrested#49

Discussion in 'Trials' started by tlcya, Jul 29, 2017.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. tlcya

    tlcya Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    36,705
    Likes Received:
    4,782
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG]
    George Wagner is accused of killing a family of 8 living on a pot farm in Pike County OH. While first thought to be drug related the killings now could be the result of a custody battle. 3 other members of the Wagner family have been arrested as well. So many twists and turns and Websleuths members are on top of every single thing that happens in the shocking case.

    The gruesome slayings have rattled this southeast corner of Appalachian Ohio, a region that culturally identifies more closely with neighboring Kentucky and West Virginia than the state’s northern cities.

    [...]

    Adding to the shock was the discovery of hundreds of illegal marijuana plants on Rhoden’s property, highlighting the region’s dependency on the illegal drug trade as jobs in agriculture and timber have dried up.

    Audio 911 Calls

    PRESSER: APRIL 27, 2016

    Video Interview with Attorney General DeWine Published 8-13-16


    Minors: You may discuss what is covered in the main stream media regarding the custody of minor children. If posting snips from articles regarding the children please redact their names. These babes are innocents. One day they will google their names or those of their parents. And plenty will come up. Let's be respectful of them and the catastrophic loss they have suffered at such tender ages. Thanks.

    DO NOT SLEUTH STILL LIVING FAMILY MEMBERS' FACEBOOK PAGES AND POST ABOUT IT HERE. Just don't mention it. Period.

    Leave the politics, both national and local, at the door. There is no room for them here.

    Rules Etiquette & Information

    CASE NOTES (courtesy of cujenn81) this link contains locations, distance, victim info, relationships and more.

    MEDIA LINKS NO DISCUSSION
    CASE MAP (courtesy of K.L.Puyallup)
    Preliminary Autopsy Reports
    Final Autopsy Reports source article

    Thread #33
    Thread #34
    Thread #35



    Thread #39
    Thread #40
    Thread #41
    Thread #42
    Thread #43

    Thread #44
    Thread #45
    Thread #46
    Thread #47
    Thread #48
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Jun 11, 2019
    bluenoser and MsJosie like this.
  2. sillybilly

    sillybilly WS Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    20,018
    Likes Received:
    17,573
    Trophy Points:
    113
    ADMIN NOTE:

    The number of off topic posts in this thread is unacceptable.

    This thread is about the Rhoden family murders. Do not make the thread about yourself and do not discuss other members. If there is a concern about a post, use the Report feature to let WS staff know about it and do not discuss it on the board.

    Please do not bring social media hoopla and drama from other boards/sites into discussion at Websleuths. It can only serve to bring WS down to the same level ... which we are not.

    Do not respond to posts that are obviously off topic. It only makes the job of cleaning up the thread so much harder. We appreciate when you Report TOS violations quickly so we can catch things before they get out of hand.

    WS staff do not and cannot sit in each and every WS thread to read what is going on in real time. So, posts like "mods please delete if not allowed" are usually NOT seen by a Mod unless someone Reports them. If you think something might not be allowed, please ASK first so WS staff don't have to clean up all the mess that follows if it is not allowed.

    As always, your co-operation is appreciated.
     
  3. sillybilly

    sillybilly WS Administrator Staff Member Administrator Moderator

    Messages:
    20,018
    Likes Received:
    17,573
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Please continue discussion here.

    Continued off topic posting will not be taken lightly and may result in a thread reply ban or other loss of posting privileges. Remember to stay on topic and do not discuss religion as it is also against The Rules Websleuths has in place.

    Thanks.
     
    Cool Cats, MsJosie, Dudly and 3 others like this.
  4. Betty P

    Betty P Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,927
    Likes Received:
    30,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Thank you, sillybilly!
     
    Cool Cats, MsJosie, Niner and 2 others like this.
  5. NWLady

    NWLady Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,597
    Likes Received:
    2,603
    Trophy Points:
    113
    IIRC, JW's and G4's children are in state custody? So, are they allowed to visit with them per phone from jail and/or are they allowed to visit them in jail? I'm just curious. Thoughts please?
     
  6. MittenScarpetta

    MittenScarpetta Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    1,830
    Likes Received:
    8,272
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I believe the two children living with the Wagners were originally in state custody upon arrests. Currently, it’s JMO, but I don’t feel that is any longer the case. This is also JMO, but I’m extremely doubtful the two minor children are visiting their father’s in jail considering the severity of the charges and custody of one of those children is said to be primary motive.
     
  7. Cool Cats

    Cool Cats COLUMBO "One more thing" MONK "A jungle out there"

    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    7,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Let's say we have a dad who has joint custody of his child, he has custodial rights to make important decisions for his child, but then he goes to jail.
    At that point he is still the child's legal parent but he loses his custodial rights.
    (some guardianship rights, important decision making rights, may still be in effect)

    Now the mother has full custody and can make all the child raising decisions herself, including how she wants to handle jail visitation and phone communication.

    Dad cannot force mom to bring the child to jail for visits or to take his phone calls. If the dad is cut off like that he would need a court order to force the mom to give him some communication with his child, at least through phone/Skype/email.

    I think it's likely that GW4 and Jake have some form of phone communication with their child but it would be up to the guardians/Child Services to decide about in-person jail visits.
    If the child's guardian wants to take them for jail visits they probably could (per jail rules) but I doubt that Jake and George could "make" them go.

    **********Parental Rights of a Father in Jail**********
    Parents incarcerated in a county, state or federal prison lose many of the rights that free parents take for granted. Prisoners who are parents don’t automatically lose their right to be a parent, but they often lose the means to continue to be an engaged, included and effective parent. There are many ways the mother of a prisoner’s child can legally block the prisoner from any kind of relationship with his child.

    [​IMG]

    Basic Problem
    Fathers who go to jail remain fathers, but only technically, according to the Center for Children of Incarcerated Parents, CCIP . However, parenting requires contact and inclusion in the child’s life and this is difficult for a prisoner to achieve or maintain while behind bars. When mothers choose not to include the prisoner in the child’s life, there is little the father can do about it.

    Lack of Jailhouse Visits
    A prisoner has no ability to force the mother of his minor child younger than the age of 18 to bring the child to visits at the county jail or prison, the CCIP notes. Although prisoner might try to file suit to force such visits, such a suit will require hiring of an attorney. There are no provisions for free legal representation from behind bars for these kinds of cases.

    Refused Phone Calls
    Most prisoners are allowed to make collect calls and paid-for calls depending on their monetary resources in prison. Fathers have the right to call their home but that does not mean the mother will accept a collect call, or answer her phone when the prisoner calls on his dime. The mother has the right to refuse to allow the prisoner to talk to his child on the phone.

    Blocked Correspondence
    Prisoners can write all the letters they can afford to write and send home, but there’s no guarantee that mothers will deliver letters to the child. Mothers can also easily intercept letters--both ways. Minors have none of the usual rights to secure postal services that adults have.

    No Right to Information
    Mothers of the children of prisoners have no legal obligation to keep in contact with the prisoner in any fashion once the cell doors close. Prisoners can do little to force a mother to interact with him or include him in parenting decisions unless he files a lawsuit.

    Losing All Rights
    If a prisoner still has legal joint custody of the child, some guardianship rights may still be in effect. Mothers may have to seek the father’s permission for the child to undergo life-threatening elective surgery, for example. If this becomes a problem, mothers can file a motion to have the incarcerated father stripped of his custody and decision-making rights altogether. According to the CCIP, most jurisdictions rule on these motions in favor of the mother, especially since the father often has no means to hire a private attorney and defend his rights in court.

    Family and Corrections Network: A Father's Story

    Parental Rights of a Father in Jail | Livestrong.com
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
    superbee, ShHolmz, Fletcher73 and 8 others like this.
  8. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    31,706
    Likes Received:
    62,971
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Updated hearing dates. Sorry about all caps, but just copy/pasting! :)

    Jake:
    Court Dates:
    06/10/2019 02:00 PM PRE-TRIAL DEERING, RANDY D

    09/17/2019 09:30 AM MOTION HEARING DEERING, RANDY D

    Docket:
    6/10/2019 11. DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO OHIO R. CRIM. P.42(E) REGARDING FUNDS FOR DEFENSE EXPERTS FILED
    Attorney: MEYERS, GREGORY W
    06/10/2019 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION #11 DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO PROCEED PURSUANT TO OHIO R. CRIM.P.42(E) REGARDING FUNDS FOR DEFENSE EXPERTS FILED
    06/10/2019 JOURNAL ENTRY ORDERING FILING UNDER SEAL -- THE ENVELOPE TO WHICH THIS JOURNAL ENTRY IS ATTACHED CONTAINS THREE (3) MOTIONS AND THREE (3) JOURNAL ENTRIES FILED UNDER SEAL WITH THE JUDGE OF THIS COURT ON THIS 10TH DAY OF JUNE, 2019; THE CLERK OF COURTS SHALL HOLD THE CONTENTS OF THE ENVELOPE UNDER SEAL, AND THAT THE ENVELOPE SHALL NOT BE OPENED, AND THE CONTENTS OF THE ENVELOPE SHALL NOT BE DISCLOSED, EXCEPT UPON ORDER OF THIS COURT OR UPON THE ORDER OF A COURT OF JURISDICTION SUPERIOR TO THIS COURT
    06/10/2019 CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE

    link: https://www.pikecountycpcourt.org/e...wE43WAseMeRo*mVm1vaqZopMgipLm0EJ4HlLJi2yrmHUA


    George IV
    Court Dates:
    06/10/2019 10:00 AM PRE-TRIAL DEERING, RANDY D

    07/24/2019 01:30 PM PRE-TRIAL DEERING, RANDY D

    Docket:
    6/10/2019 """""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""""
    Judge: DEERING, RANDY D
    Event: PRE-TRIAL
    Date: 07/24/2019 Time: 01:30 PM
    06/10/2019 COSTS FOR NOTICES MAILED
    06/10/2019 CERTIFICATE FOR COURT STENOGRAPHER FEE

    link: https://www.pikecountycpcourt.org/e...wE43WAseMeRo71aXVmMizupsL6eIw4T6kqUDPrmElZd3A
     
  9. Cool Cats

    Cool Cats COLUMBO "One more thing" MONK "A jungle out there"

    Messages:
    1,511
    Likes Received:
    7,675
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Filing under seal in an envelope? What/why?..o_O
     
  10. Niner

    Niner Long time Websleuther

    Messages:
    31,706
    Likes Received:
    62,971
    Trophy Points:
    113
    [​IMG] don't know - it's sealed....
     
  11. Betty P

    Betty P Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,927
    Likes Received:
    30,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Apparently, this has to do with the discussion yesterday about Jake's defense attorneys wanting to get money approved to hire some defense experts. Maybe they want someone to testify about ballistics or the evidence on the silencer part? IDK. Why would that need to be kept from the public? Bizarre.

    They should give up the pretense and just hold these trials in private. :rolleyes::mad:

    ETA: Why three motions to be kept under seal? I can understand sealing some things after a trial is over, but I don't understand sealing a motion during the pre-trial phase, before the trial has even begun??

    ETA2: Here's an editorial of sorts objecting to this kind of secrecy in another court where it has become common:

    When It Comes to Sealing Court Records, The Presumption of Public Access Requires That You “Just Say No” - Public Justice

    The way I interpret it in this situation, is it really necessary to go to these lengths to protect the defendant from public knowledge of details of the crime they're accused of? According to the First Amendment, the court needs to show a compelling need for secrecy.

    JMO, it's one thing to seal from the public information about discovery evidence, it's a completely different issue to seal the actual motions.
    In the opinion of some legal folks, the court is required to justify this action.

    With the hidden motions, are Jake and his attorneys threatening to implicate other parties and crimes involved in the murders or events that led up to the murders?
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  12. rsd1200

    rsd1200 If there's no link, it's just my own 2¢.

    Messages:
    9,842
    Likes Received:
    20,988
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They'd not be allowed contact visits, but children are permitted visits to jailed parents. They've not been convicted yet either. It's possible.
     
  13. sunshineray

    sunshineray Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    5,297
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Just catching up on the two pretrials for the W brothers. Very concerning to me is how AC fumbled about there not being any DNA info/discovery to turn over to defense in GW4 case. She sounded very inept at that moment, IMO.
     
    rsd1200 and Cool Cats like this.
  14. sunshineray

    sunshineray Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    856
    Likes Received:
    5,297
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The motions under seal in JW's case could very well have to do with his daughter and a lack of communication with her being provided to him?
     
    Kyshoegal and Cool Cats like this.
  15. Johnny B Bad

    Johnny B Bad Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    610
    Likes Received:
    2,598
    Trophy Points:
    93
    If our tax money is paying for all attorneys and pays the court and jail fees why are they sealing thing from general public, these Wagners are not royalty nor are they the rank of the president of the United States, so if judge Deering seals things from the public eye watch out something dirty is about to go on! JMO
     
  16. Betty P

    Betty P Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,927
    Likes Received:
    30,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Interesting. Do you have a link or more specific reference? In which hearing was this, GW4 or Jake's? I'm genuinely curious, not trying to argue. TIA
     
  17. Betty P

    Betty P Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    10,927
    Likes Received:
    30,196
    Trophy Points:
    113
    I'm still processing this and I think it may have to do with the Wags trying to drag into the trials people and alleged events that had nothing to do with the murders. Maybe its the Wags trying to falsely smear individuals and, by association, try to make it appear to the public that the investigation and evidence against the Wags was rigged and false. I don't believe that's accurate, but I do believe the Wags are evil and will make up any story or level any false accusation to get out of trouble.

    ETA: It may be the court that wants this information under seal, not the Wags, because the accusations they contain are so false and inflammatory they could negatively impact public opinion and result in a mistrial. Most likely, that is the intent of Jake's defense team - to get a mistrial or something similar.
     
    Last edited: Jun 11, 2019
  18. OhioBlues

    OhioBlues Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    Trophy Points:
    93
    The W's have the right to a fair trial and the public does not have a right to learn about minor children.
     
    Kyshoegal, Chelly, bunnylady and 5 others like this.
  19. OhioBlues

    OhioBlues Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    469
    Likes Received:
    2,358
    Trophy Points:
    93
     
  20. FrescaandSouthernComfort

    FrescaandSouthernComfort Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    157
    Likes Received:
    954
    Trophy Points:
    93

    Very strange feeling that it is a Motion to Suppress. The Wagners want the witness and the
    info about the suppressed or the prosecution wants the witness alive and able to testify at
    trial. Believe it has been an undercurrent to the lack of response for certain discovery.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page



  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice