- Joined
- Jun 10, 2019
- Messages
- 1,115
- Reaction score
- 3,410
Yes, victim coul be man, woman, child, anyone.Victim(s) as in plural , multiple more than 1 victim, child or not .
But probability seems much different while talking about one perpetrator controlling three victims (quite hard to do) and like in this case: one person being able to control one little girl while carrying two more small, unconscious or already dead children in sleeping bags after ambushing them in tent (hard but quite possible).
The offender has no idea who may be around that site there cold be counselors or yes other people to alert the counselors of someone carrying (as you seem to be asserting) a child or children across the campground .
Thats risk, its high risk , the danger there is being discovered
Of course, if offender saw that area just once or twice, if he has no idea where and when he could meet someone and be detected that's high risk.
But if he's local, like GLH or someone like him... that risk may be not that high.
If he grew up around there, he may knew that area well. He may and most likely heard many stories from people who maybe worked there (directly from them or just passed by as a story by someone who heard something from them), more than likely had some acquaintances with daughters who shared their stories, just through regular gossiping.
He could walk around there in late autumn, winter, spring almost freely, learn all the paths, buildings, arrangement of tents, everything.
As far as I know it wasn't guarded well while not in use.
Local guy would know the weather, would know circumstances of nightly darkness around there. He (perp) for sure knew which houses around are empty and safe to burglarize.
At that fatal night he hang up in that darkness and could watch and track counsellors, learn where they are and from where they might come. He could quite safely assume that if anyone will be coming by, their flashlights will announce their presence at least a moment before they will be able to notice him.
It's not impossible task for someone comfortable with these "pitch dark" nights around there and the general area.
Adults and older teen counsellors at camp weren't at high alert, watching surroundings, expecting some possible attack coming from the night. It's not that hard to hide from people who are just camping and going through the night. In my opinion is doable.
I did it many times as a teen, sneaking out from camps at night, and sneaking out back in undetected. Few times people catched me for a moment with lights from their flashlights and still didn't noticed me.
Of course I was supposed to be there, so risk wasn't that high for me even if somebody would see me, but I'm also not a killer, so... I'm just guessing.
I'm just trying to say (and sorry for my poor English) that it might not be that risky and challenging as it seem to be, if the perp felt comfortable in that area.
But, having said that and judging just by my experience, I would never use a flashlight while hiding in the woods and trying to sneak back or out the camp alone. I would, going with someone who doesn't know area that well or can't rely mostly on hearing and memory.
Back to the case, adding all publicly available details I would say that's at least two people job, and that at least one from these people wasn't up for the plan the other one/s had. Like one was on rape-killing spree and other one thought that they are up for kidnapping and panicked while seeing what the first one did, tried to clean up and said at some point that he's out of it.
If there was a community where GLH was passing by as such an outstanding, awesome, nice guy, then there was probably no shortage of random pieces of garbage who would keep quiet about thing like that forever.
For sure it was. I was just thinking, sorry that it isn't helpful.There was more to it