wfgodot
Former Member
- Joined
- Mar 4, 2009
- Messages
- 30,166
- Reaction score
- 731
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I wonder if the samples will be of any use. I hope so, this is a terrible event.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
I think that the biggest injustice of this case is the fact that two shoe prints were found. One size 9.5 and other a 7 while Gene Hart had a size 11 shoe. Also a damn good fingerprint on the Flashlight that didn't match Hart. Now Hart seems like a suspect with his past and knowledge of the area but nothing at the crime scene says he was there. Now add in that after the verdict in 79 that LE and others were not going to pursue other suspects, that is what makes this case off the charts. The famillies of these girls deserve better, LE should try everything in there power to find out who did this.
Mmmm.....motive, opportunity, fugitive, items in the cave that GLH hid in were taken from the campsite, glasses were stolen - GLH always stole women's glasses, friends said he always talked about wanting to rape little girls, he liked tying females up, he was a known rapist, he was type O blood, secreter, with deformed sperm due to botched vasectomy which was a pretty close match to degraded samples tested, hair was consistent with GLH, he for whatever sick perverted reason enjoyed making groaning noises which were witnessed by his Tulsa victims and heard the night of the murders.
That's enough to convince me they were on the right track, I would have gone after him for sure. But they didn't have solid evidence, so the jury did what they had to do. Railroading someone or planting evidence to secure a conviction is never okay. He was acquitted. But it doesn't mean he was innocent. If he was involved he had help. IMO
Don't forget, when he was arrested, he was wearing eyeglasses that came from the crime scene.
IIRC there was a quote from one of the jurors on the case that said, to paraphrase, they didn't vote "not guilty" because they thought he was innocent. They just felt there was someone else with him.
I think that the biggest injustice of this case is the fact that two shoe prints were found. One size 9.5 and other a 7 while Gene Hart had a size 11 shoe. Also a damn good fingerprint on the Flashlight that didn't match Hart. Now Hart seems like a suspect with his past and knowledge of the area but nothing at the crime scene says he was there. Now add in that after the verdict in 79 that LE and others were not going to pursue other suspects, that is what makes this case off the charts. The famillies of these girls deserve better, LE should try everything in there power to find out who did this.
Mmmm.....motive, opportunity, fugitive, items in the cave that GLH hid in were taken from the campsite, glasses were stolen - GLH always stole women's glasses, friends said he always talked about wanting to rape little girls, he liked tying females up, he was a known rapist, he was type O blood, secreter, with deformed sperm due to botched vasectomy which was a pretty close match to degraded samples tested, hair was consistent with GLH, he for whatever sick perverted reason enjoyed making groaning noises which were witnessed by his Tulsa victims and heard the night of the murders.
That's enough to convince me they were on the right track, I would have gone after him for sure. But they didn't have solid evidence, so the jury did what they had to do. Railroading someone or planting evidence to secure a conviction is never okay. He was acquitted. But it doesn't mean he was innocent. If he was involved he had help. IMO
I think that the biggest injustice of this case is the fact that two shoe prints were found. One size 9.5 and other a 7 while Gene Hart had a size 11 shoe. Also a damn good fingerprint on the Flashlight that didn't match Hart. Now Hart seems like a suspect with his past and knowledge of the area but nothing at the crime scene says he was there. Now add in that after the verdict in 79 that LE and others were not going to pursue other suspects, that is what makes this case off the charts. The famillies of these girls deserve better, LE should try everything in there power to find out who did this.
Why would he wear the glasses and have all these things tied to him while wearing gloves and going about not being seen and killing three people quietly in the middle of the night to not be discovered? It seems so easy on the cirumstancial evidence and non excistence at the crime scene. Why go through so much planning to leave nothing at the crime scene to leave so much informatione in so called caves?
He was careful and sneaky in order to get what he came for but he was also arrogant, believing he wouldn't be caught. He took huge risks. He left the Tulsa women alive to die slowly (sadistic), but they lived. He just always thought he was above the law, thumbed his nose at it and seemed to enjoy toying with police. Hiding for years right under their noses. Always having a slew of enablers to get him out of trouble and cover for him. The eyeglasses were his calling card, a dare to find him. His constant breaking of the law and evasion of it's consequences are proof of his diabolical and arrogant psyche. "THE KILLER WAS HERE BYE BYE FOOLS".
Women's underwear were found in the cave, tested positive for semen that was the same type as GLH. The cave was very hard to find, investigators stumbled upon it after the murders and that writing just happened to be in there as a prank?
I sure wish there was a way to definitively connect GLH or exonerate his name once and for all.