faefrost
New Member
- Joined
- Aug 27, 2008
- Messages
- 2,285
- Reaction score
- 0
I can't imagine DC would work for Baez without a payment agreement of some sort, if he was behind on his mortgage, etc. The story says the Baez law firm "never paid DC". Does that mean they were supposed to, but didn't, so he went running to the Anthonys? And they haven't paid him yet EITHER??? No wonder he never told them about his escapade in the woods!! :crazy:
If DC did not get paid by JB, and had no written agreement that can be produced by anyone, then (and please someone please please please correct me if I am wrong), he is not a subject of JB's attorney work product privelege. Anything he did, is not considered work product to the case. And any conversations he had with JB are not privileged, and any conversations he witnessed between KC and JB are no longer protected by privilege.
I understand that KC is the one who holds the privilege. Not ultimately JB. But he is the one that has been retained to manage it. He is her qualified legal representation. But ultimately the responsibility for seeing that all parties get paid for services does reside with the client. Workers have the right to publicly say what they did in the case or investigation in order to dispute or recieve their payment. This is why as a lawyer you do not hire outside specialists until or unless you know exactly how they are going to be paid. This is yet another reason why criminal lawyers are not allowed to operate on contingency fees or compensation. WHich more and more it keeps looking like what Baez is doing.