Miss Muffet
New Member
- Joined
- Jul 20, 2009
- Messages
- 2,125
- Reaction score
- 9
Are drugs sold down there? We have to consider every possibility.The only other access that doesn't require significant effort to climb a fence and/or retaining wall is south 18th street that goes to a bike trail & park. While this is close to where Paul was last seen, I don't know why anyone would go down that way at that time of night, especially someone that lived in the area & was thus familiar with things.
I know you qualified that as random violence, but the overall violence in Southside is significantly high for the metro.Regarding foul play, if it was random street violence (which is fairly rare in that area), I can't think that someone would (and I could be wrong here) go to the effort required to dispose of a body in any significant way if things turned that way.
Check out this article titled Pittsburgh’s South Side has had largest number of violent crimes for four years running: http://publicsource.org/investigati...of-violent-crimes-for-four-years#.VP8jUOk5By0
I'm not saying Southside is dangerous, not in a way that I would avoid. I just think it's important to clarify there is a certain level of danger walking around late at night alone. It's not too dangerous to doo, but it requires street smarts. And PK looked inebriated in the video which would make him much less aware of his surroundings.
But I agree that it's not likely random violence because those types of criminals usually don't dispose of bodies. They just do their violence and take off running.
There's also the possibility PK ran into someone he knew after he left his house. He could have left to look for his roommates after the disagreement they had. Maybe he ran into his roommates while out walking around. Maybe he left the apartment first on foot and they left afterwards in their car.
Agreed. I believe his body would have been found already if it's in Southside. There aren't many places to hide a body there, and the area has been searched repeatedly.So basically the river scenario makes sense as far as having found nothing yet but less so when factoring in the available access to said river.
Since it was clear you are from Pittsburgh too, I read your other posts and want to comment on your being perplexed by McDonalds. My children are in the same age range as these young adults. My son lives in Vermont where there are no fast food restaurants. All of the food is hip, artisan, farm to table, etc. Even the bar food is fantastic. Yet, every now and then, he and his friends get a hankering for fast food and drive 40 minutes to the closest fast food restaurant, which happens to be a McDonalds. The next nearest fast food is over an hour away in two different towns. They really do crave going to McDonalds, and it's quite the event to the point I actually hear about it---like it was a great fantastic rare adventure.
The only problem I have with PK's roommates going to McDonalds that night is they had been drinking earlier. They clearly have embraced a Southside walking lifestyle via walking back and forth from the bar, yet they'd get into a car after drinking all night and drive to McDonalds? That just doesn't make sense since it's unlikely one of them was a designated driver due to they were drinking within walking distance.
That's the reason I'm suspicious of the McDonald's trip. Not because people living in Southside are too snobby to eat at McDonalds when there are other great alternatives closer by, but because these roommates got into a car after a night of drinking after they had been responsibly walking to/from the bar earlier.
Maybe Paul left the house after the disagreement, and the roommates got in the car to find him. That seems to be a more likely reason they'd get into their car after drinking. People are more irrational when fighting and make decisions like drinking and driving they normally wouldn't do. The fact they didn't drive while drinking at the bar makes me feel it's unlikely they suddenly decided get food at McDonalds.
I wonder when the roommates told the police about PK cutting himself with the "glass or something." Did they tell that the very first time they were questioned in the disappearance? Or did they give this excuse after police found evidence of blood and re-questioned them?
.