The FBI appears to be doubling down on the possibility that they were victims of a hired hit. This could be a ”tactical statement” that is intended to provoke some kind of a response from one or more People if Interest. Or, they might really be on to something. By and large, the FBI does not say anything or release any information just because ” curious people want to know ”. They do it to move the case along or perhaps just satiate the media. The known facts about this case are really at odds with the hired hit theory. When they left the bar, the people they were with had the impression Richard was going to take Danielle back to New Jersey. The only route that would make any sense would be over the Ben Franklin Bridge but the bridge CCTV did not pick them up. There is the possibility that the cam was defective or non-operational but that has never been claimed. The most probable conclusion is that they did not cross the bridge. Could they have been abducted somewhere in downtown Philadelphia between where the truck was parked and the bridge? Perhaps but it seems like a real lousy place to pull of such a move. Far more likely, they went somewhere other than directly to Danielle’s condo. But if they did, nobody would have known where they went. I know nothing about the ” hired hit” business but following a target through the streets of Philly on a very cold night, waiting while they went to a bar, looking for the optimal time I make a move, just doesn't seem to be how it is done. Far more likely they went somewhere else; another bar perhaps, and skidded on the frozen roadway into a body if water. Google Earth shows many bodies of water all around urban Philadelphia. Where might they have gone; what bodies of water could a truck careened into without being noticed? Therein lies the answer I am pretty sure.