Discussion in 'Travis Alexander Trial - The State vs. Jodi Arias' started by SoSueMe, May 21, 2013.
ITA with you. I saw that and I too think JW said something about Samantha crying.
Had to redo this, but it will make us feel better.... Enjoy!
But JA gets to appeal to their passions. :stormingmad:
Yeah we Texans woulda hung her already
Or Alabama. We have no problem with the DP.
It's right here:
I mean the twitter acct. for Maricopa Court
that is my understanding...they were not allowed to. Nor were they allowed to speak to her directly .
as a recovering drunk, i say you should have a good, cold vodka martini straight up, with 3 olives.
that's what I'D have!!!!!!
Yeah.. It's like old sayin' 'Rip the knob off' but TV's & Radios don't have knobs anymore so they hide the remote :floorlaugh:
My Dad's 71 maybe it's an age thing too???
4 month old and 7 month old lost their lives in OK tornadoes.
Oh my goodness.
Thanks wasn't enough.
JA will have the smirk wiped off her face within hours of going to prison.
She actually may never smirk again.
I thought that was the Starship Enterprize at first.
Freaking gross! Wow.
Jury Deliberations Clock = just over 6 hours!
First post : ) I quit almost two years ago. Vaping Black Cherry Marshmellow right now LOL!
If someone on that jury is anti-DP, they should be disqualified and replaced.
18.5.i Deliberations in a Capital Case:
In the event a deliberating juror is excused during either the aggravation or penalty phases due to inability or disqualification to perform required duties, the court may substitute an alternate juror, choosing from among the alternates in the order previously designated, unless disqualified, to join in the deliberations. In the event that an alternate or alternates are substituted during the aggravation or penalty deliberations, the jurors shall only begin anew for the phase of the sentencing that they are currently deliberating. The jurors shall not deliberate anew about a verdict already reached and entered.
Hell yeah! Send it on over here. I'd love to be on the jury and let it pull it's passive-aggressive, game playin crap.
You can scour the annals of human history and you will never find, no matter where or when, a place where people aren't trying to get it on.
I think I finally get it, thanks to Mr Pizza
1 The Jury gets 2 choices, Life or Death
2 The Jury is split because ultimately on the Life decision the Judge will decide on LWOP or Life which includes parole.
I think the majority wants Death and that majority cant accept the possibility of parole.
Who ever wants death just can't compromise the possibility of her getting out in 20 years.
Does that make sense? I'm sure you all have this down by now, but I'm just logging on since this all happened.