Concerned Papa
New Member
- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 2,708
- Reaction score
- 24
This tactic will fail - it's a slippery slope.
Amendola is trying to do a clever trick of scapegoating Curley, Shultz, and Paterno because they are in trouble too and he knows they can't or won't admit they stood by and did nothing. Their lawyers won't let them talk either way. So he is using their silence to "prove" that nothing happened with Sandusky and his victims.
But it's a slippery slope because the university and the public and the world know the facts from McQueary and the victim testimony.
The problem is that those guys believed that since the first Grand Jury failed to indict Sandusky then they figured it was all over back then and the allegations would just go away. Maybe they thought Jerry would "cure" himself or something - magical thinking.
We all know they were indifferent to the victims and only cared about reputations, money, and the football program. So Amendola is trying to say that his client is innocent compared to those guys, but Curley and Paterno were fired BECAUSE of Sandusky, not the other way around. :twocents:
This lawyer is a piece of work. Each time he gives a statement, I find myself more and more amazed at the incredulous position he places himself and his client in.
This time he says:
"Well, in order to believe Mike McQueary, you would have to believe he told (Penn State Atletic Director) Tim Curley (who's now on administratvie leave), (Penn State Vice President) Gary Schultz (who was in charge of the school's police department and has now stepped down) and (now fired Penn State head coach) Joe Paterno that he observed Jerry Sandusky having anal sex with a young child in a shower at Penn State and they did nothing about it.
"Now, I know those three men. They're not my friends, but I know them," Amendola said. "They are reputable, very conservative people, and I don't believe for a second that they were told that information and did nothing about it other than to tell Jerry Sandusky simply, 'Don't shower with kids in the Penn State shower rooms anymore.' That makes no sense."
On one hand he is stating the reputable, conservative nature of Joe Paterno, Gary Schultz, and Tim Curley, while on the other hand he is calling these same 3 acquaintances out as LIARS! He says he doesn't believe for a second they were told about his client raping a child and did nothing, yet that is PRECISELY what all three of these reputable men have stated in their testimony to the grand jury. All three men told the grand jury they were aware of some version of McQueary's accusations, but not one said a word about calling any Law enforcement agency to report the crime.
Any way you slice it, dice it, or chop it up, they did NOTHING!
Which is it, mr lawyer? Are you saying McQueary's lying or are you saying these three men you call "reputable" are liars? You can't have it both ways!