believe09
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2007
- Messages
- 28,094
- Reaction score
- 536
To be more specific, Thought-I would like to lay responsibility at the door of Steve, which does not mean that I do.
Yes, JOSH was the one who killed the children and himself. Josh killed Susan imo-perhaps he had some help from his father but who knows.
The subject of the thread is Leach's statements regarding cyber bullying contributing...discounting the effect of cyber bullying pretty much knocks the bullying/suicide threads on the forum out of the park if the determination is that cyberbullying shouldnt or wouldnt have affected Josh. IMO.
Where Leach's statements go awry for me is that he concedes that the Powell's cyberbullied the Cox's.
Hate begets hate begets hate begets hate. The kids were the pawns imo-Josh's ultimate act of bullying back. His revenge.
I think the dialogue we should consider is whether or not cyberbullying is justified in some cases and not in others. Again, JMO.
Yes, JOSH was the one who killed the children and himself. Josh killed Susan imo-perhaps he had some help from his father but who knows.
The subject of the thread is Leach's statements regarding cyber bullying contributing...discounting the effect of cyber bullying pretty much knocks the bullying/suicide threads on the forum out of the park if the determination is that cyberbullying shouldnt or wouldnt have affected Josh. IMO.
Where Leach's statements go awry for me is that he concedes that the Powell's cyberbullied the Cox's.
Hate begets hate begets hate begets hate. The kids were the pawns imo-Josh's ultimate act of bullying back. His revenge.
I think the dialogue we should consider is whether or not cyberbullying is justified in some cases and not in others. Again, JMO.