thedeviledadvocate
New Member
- Joined
- Sep 28, 2009
- Messages
- 761
- Reaction score
- 1
The seven counts against KC were as follows
Count One, First Degree Murder:
Lesser Included of Count One, Second Degree Murder: (depraved mind murder, not premeditated)
Count Two, Aggravated Child Abuse:
Count Three, Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child:
Counts Four Through Seven, Giving False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer in Reference to a Missing Person:
1. Do you think the state proved BARD counts 1 thru 7.
2. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 2 thru 7.
3. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 3 thru 7.
4. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 4 thru 7.
Why do you think the state proved BARD? (BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT)
It has been 3 months since the verdict. Some posters seem to have an interest in debating and or discussing the evidence, while other posters are no longer interested in rehashing, or debating the evidence. I thought a thread dedicated to rehashing the evidence might give those of us a place to debate, without disrupting other threads.
I think a new poll that tells how we feel 3 months after the verdict would be interesting. Please vote, and if you would like discuss what evidence brought you to what you believe the state proved or did not prove, feel free
Count One, First Degree Murder:
Lesser Included of Count One, Second Degree Murder: (depraved mind murder, not premeditated)
Count Two, Aggravated Child Abuse:
Count Three, Aggravated Manslaughter of a Child:
Counts Four Through Seven, Giving False Information to a Law Enforcement Officer in Reference to a Missing Person:
1. Do you think the state proved BARD counts 1 thru 7.
2. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 2 thru 7.
3. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 3 thru 7.
4. Do you think the state proved BARD only counts 4 thru 7.
Why do you think the state proved BARD? (BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT)
It has been 3 months since the verdict. Some posters seem to have an interest in debating and or discussing the evidence, while other posters are no longer interested in rehashing, or debating the evidence. I thought a thread dedicated to rehashing the evidence might give those of us a place to debate, without disrupting other threads.
I think a new poll that tells how we feel 3 months after the verdict would be interesting. Please vote, and if you would like discuss what evidence brought you to what you believe the state proved or did not prove, feel free