A
ajt400
Guest
I think both Smit and Douglas believed that the R's were guilty---or at least that's the way the evidence looked to them when first entering the case.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by sissi
He is not hired by Boulder,he is working the case on his own,nothing from which to walk away.
Or am I wrong here?
IMO JMO
What trials...info please...???!!!~~~Originally posted by Toth
What about those perps he has prayed with and then later testified against at their trials?
Originally posted by sissi
Yes ,he did do just as you said,his job wasn't to come in and look for evidence ,it was to look within the evidence hoping to gain a new perspective or find something overlooked. It's just too bad he didn't get the call sooner when his insight and expertise would have been of more benefit.
JMO
Originally posted by SisterSocks
I believe your correct Sissi. Thank you !
Originally posted by ajt400
I think both Smit and Douglas believed that the R's were guilty---or at least that's the way the evidence looked to them when first entering the case.....
Originally posted by TLynn
If Smit actually stood in JonBenet's "shoes" - he'd have asked...
How did the pineapple get into my digestive system
Who gave it to me -
What time did I eat it -
When did I die -
Instead he saw an "open" window - which was NOT a crime scene photo and deduced an intruder. He never asked -
Who opened the window that wide
Who took the picture
Why is it being misrepresented
He was duped. The Hen outfoxed him.
He chased a fake clue and didn't pursue hard evidence that the victim gave him.
There is NO EXCUSE for that. Smit NEVER stood in JonBenet's shoes.
Originally posted by sissi
Yes ,he did do just as you said,his job wasn't to come in and look for evidence ,it was to look within the evidence hoping to gain a new perspective or find something overlooked.