I'm curious as to why no one consider asking about a possible link to deliberate attack on Sissy Austin's attack one year ago?
Also, of note, and in my wonderful graphic design work, I've circled where he was arrested vs where she was attacked.
![]()
Sissy Austin: former Greens Senate candidate attacked while running in a Victorian state forest
Djab Wurrung woman is recovering from injuries after allegedly being knocked unconscious with a rock tied to a stick near Ballaratwww.theguardian.com
Except Chris Dawson killed his wife, Paul Wilkinson killed his lover. Police will allege the accused wasn’t known to SM. Slightly different circumstances imo.ya think??.. To charge someone with murder, in Victoria, requires a really hard , long list of unarguable facts, which are put before the Dept. of Public Prosecution, pored over by DPP lawyers, who then submit it to a judge, who gives the nod to the Vic Police to charge the offender forthwith. It isn't done on a whim. Circumstantial evidence is considered hard evidence, and people currently are doing life on circumstances that pointed clearly to their guilt.
Quite a few blokes in AU are , as I type, serving life without parole without disclosing the whereabouts of the body of the women ( it's always women ) they murdered, Chris Dawson, Paul Wilkinson, etc...
It was very clearly stated in the presser (multiple times) that it was not a hit-run but a deliberate and intentional attack.
One of the reporters asked a question about Police searching Lal Lal Forest … it is down towards Scotsburn … but in an easterly direction …he may know that area well??? There is also a huge waterway there …The suspect lives at Scotsburn and the alleged attack was at Mount Clear.
IMO Murderers will often move a body away (in a different direction) from where they live to distance themselves from the crime.
I am wondering if the nearby bushfires West of Mount Clear 2-3 weeks after Sam disappeared may have been intentionally lit in an attempt to dispose of evidence?
These are the lawyers representing him in 2 other upcoming matters as posted by investigatefred above:Maybe dad has hired a really good lawyer.
Hi Warshawski, they just that an update at 4:25 and I think this is his first ever charge?? I'm trying to remember what she said.He may very well have ‘priors’. Commissioner was asked he he ‘was known to police’ and he declined to answer.
Irrespective,I don’t believe that scenario would constitute a charge of Murder, nor a statement that it was a deliberate attack on Samantha. I think that would be more like Manslaughter, interfering with body, DUIs etc
One of the reporters asked a question about Police searching Lal Lal Forest … it is down towards Scotsburn … but in an easterly direction …he may know that area well??? There is also a huge waterway there …
IMO
I was just thinking about this as well. It's half past midnight where I am and I should be asleep, but plan on doing some digging tomorrow.I'm curious as to why no one consider asking about a possible link to deliberate attack on Sissy Austin's attack one year ago?
Also, of note, and in my wonderful graphic design work, I've circled where he was arrested vs where she was attacked.
![]()
Sissy Austin: former Greens Senate candidate attacked while running in a Victorian state forest
Djab Wurrung woman is recovering from injuries after allegedly being knocked unconscious with a rock tied to a stick near Ballaratwww.theguardian.com
Maybe he pleads Not Guilty?Why is the murderer refusing to disclose where Samantha’s body is?
I genuinely believe it 's time to give up the hit and run thing. Hard though it is to grasp, Samantha was attacked deliberately, face to face , not known if the perpetrator had a weapon, stick, rocks, whatever, person to person. This is hard to take and hard to understand , no one knows why he did this, as yet., not that it matters why, the law does not care why he did it, and I don't have to care why he did it.
I agree with the comment it's to do with power, to wreak vengeance for a perceived lack of power, specifically one which has aggrieved him: one theory is rejection by women & taking it out on an innocent (the Claremont murderer killed when things were going wrong in his life) - a common enough occurrence I thought it worth mentioning. I have seen instances of just how angry it can make a man, revealing their deep seated issues. Her age wouldn't be relevant going from her picture and 51 isn't that old.so strange. What could the motive possibly have been?
I think we are mostly in agreement that it was a planned murder, not an accidental hit and run, so why on earth would he murder a murder a woman more than twice his age (likely to not be sexually motivated)?
If they wanted to keep that quiet, would they have the charges on a public court case site? Just wondering.Possibly might affect other unrelated charges if the guy whose posting the rumour about the CP charges is true