And on a half related side note: I don't claim, I'm a nice person, I only claim to know what I'm talking about. So ... if intelligent is defined as "follow the same theory as you" and the facts are against this theory, I may will defy your definition and I will do so the first time, just with the facts, I will do so the second time, just with the facts, maybe I will do so the third, but chances are, if I am forced to regurgitate the same nonsense three or more times, I will make the point clear in a manner that's as hard to misunderstand as possible. And if The Foreigner would have looked up closer, she would have found that of those 160-170 posts, 140-150 were responses to regurgitated theories. So, I understand that those who enjoy to chew the same half-digested stuff over and over are a bit upset. However, I would care more, those upset people would deliver an explanation including and explaining ALL known facts without weird constructions like one john brought the victim to another john and that is the one who killed all of them or the 67 years old one legged doctor can, because an athlete in the paralympics age 25 with $100,000 special prosthetic can too. Deliver such a theory, and it's worth talking about.