But it isn't a quote from anyone, certainly not the DA or the Sheriff's office. It is an additional comment by the reporter inserting the case 'de facto' knowledge.
Exactly. The DA said that they were "going to bring this case to trial." That's a fairly standard statement from a DA's office with an ongoing case, especially one that's garnered so much attention. What else are they going to say--hey, we don't know if we'll go to trial on this case? Boy, that's a recipe for getting voted out of office!
Just usual quotes for publication. And they didn't say anything about "who". The reporter added their own "background" line saying --on their own say-so, not even using the venerable source family--that TH remains the focus.
And, hmmm...I remember that this was supposed to be an "isolated" case? I agree with MarieFaith--if I were a parent with a child at that school, I'd be a little worried now.
The "other cases" reference, given Portland's previously-reported problems with a lot of sex offenders/predators (along with Vancouver's), ties to child sex rings, etc. gives me the creeps. And I can't help but think about JW and his ties. And the sex offenders in families related to this case.
I also noted that awhile ago, LE was going to put a "new lenses" on this case. Now they're going to "refocus." If they're into those type of metaphors, I hope they're moving on to "expanding our vision." Ahem.
And, this quote is important: What would actually make the case is evidence that is clearcut, Staton said.
That's exactly what many of us have been saying for awhile now. That's why some of us are still on that fence.
Staton's quote also tells me that right now, they don't have any evidence that is "clearcut." Which is very very interesting. Sad, but interesting.