I've only just heard about this case, I read earlier that she had posted a pic on Facebook of a foot print in the snow, she was asking if people thought it was a bears foot print. Hopefully it wasn't but it did look like one.
IMO they would need a warrant from a judge to gather that kind of data and invade people's privacy in that manner. IMO no judge in North America would grant such a warrant without very strong probable cause, ie proof that she was killed or kidnapped by someone who was in that area at a certain time. From what I have seen of other investigations, the French constitution is extremely protective of the personal privacy of ordinary citizens, I have no experience from Spain.There may be innocent reasons why the hiker hasn't come forward, but he needs to be found and spoken to.
I wonder if it would be possible to triangulate all mobile phone data for the area for say, the 22nd and 23rd of November, since there won't have been that many people up there. If LE could do that they could build up a picture of who was where and maybe get an idea of what has happened.
IMO it's too hard to say what causes, for eg, a catastrophic fall into an area where search crews can't find you. You could just be extra tired, distracted or confused for a few moments and make a mistake, like forgetting exactly where the trail back down is. If you do it on a street you can just retrace your steps, when you do it on a high mountain trail, the consequences can be fatal.I use the word hill loosely as in hillwalking when this often used to describe quite mountainous terrain, but I get your drift.
That's a fair point about starting altitude, my bad. Benasque is 1140m and Pic de Sauvegarde is 2738 so, without knowing her exact route , that's roughly about 1600m of ascent. Ben Nevis via the route we did was 1345m, so possibly her climb was less than I estimated, but still a fair old climb.
The witness described the backpack as large and it looks fairly big in photos I've seen, maybe 65L , but as you say could be full of ultra lightweight gear.
Hard to judge really from our armchair view what her level of expertise and fitness would be but I thought there did seem to be some harsh criticism building on here (even suggesting she was recklessly following bear tracks for goodness sake!) and felt myself wanting to try to take the balanced view.
I agree in the U.S. that they would need a warrant based on PC, I've long followed the evolving law on geo-fence warrants. I think there is a decent chance they could make a case for a warrant here, even with what is publicly known and I am guessing the authorities might know more since they are making statements that they do not believe she is on the mountain. A good article on geofence warrants (the quoted NYT article is excellent too). Do Geofence Warrants Violate the Fourth Amendment?. Since none of this would apply in Spain I'm not sure how helpful this info is - but I do think it could help locate witnesses near Esther at a particular time. There seems to be amazing cell coverage where she was.IMO they would need a warrant from a judge to gather that kind of data and invade people's privacy in that manner. IMO no judge in North America would grant such a warrant without very strong probable cause, ie proof that she was killed or kidnapped by someone who was in that area at a certain time. From what I have seen of other investigations, the French constitution is extremely protective of the personal privacy of ordinary citizens, I have no experience from Spain.
In the case of people missing on a serious mountain hike (not a stroll through a wooded park), the overwhelming presumption by Search and Rescue is accidental death. IMO it is only because she is female that this whole sexual predator scenario comes up. A 37 year old man missing in the same circumstances would be presumed to have had an accident, and after two weeks SAR would call off the search because there was no signs he was alive: no tracks, no signs of a campsite, no attempts to signal to rescuers, no cellphone use, and no indication of leaving the mountain such as taking things from the vehicle, or using a credit card or bank withdrawl. A person cannot survive for weeks in the mountains in cold weather, with no food, they will die.
We're asked not to draw comparisons to other cases, but here in Western Canada/Pacific Northwest, this happens regularly. The person is presumed dead, authorities do not continue to search and even the family gives up the search when the weather gets too bad. People hope the remains are eventually discovered by another hiker.
IMO there is an assumption that every female is the target of a sexual predator or a hostile spouse, which puts pressure on police to intensively investigate that angle beyond what the evidence indicates.
From her posts on previous treks I get the impression she was actually very capable and very prepared. The reason her pack was large was because she carried what she needed to camp overnight on these hills if necessary due to unexpected bad weather, or if she simply wanted to do that. The fact that she climbed that mountain , which is about twice the height of Ben Nevis - the highest in the UK and the highest I have ever done (and that was with a light pack) , carrying full gear indicates to me that she must have been incredibly fit.
I haven't seen anything about following footprints of wild animals, only that she was asking if a paw print she saw could be a bear.
Also there wasn't much snow up there and the weather was good the witness said.
I would question the wisdom of going up there at that time, but if she was planning to camp up there, or somewhere lower down on the descent route, then she is more likely to have set off later I think.
I agree, I have assumed she hiked from Benasque on the usual route (potentially a daytrip) east (or right) of the area where she had previously been hiking as shown by the Daily Mail map.The trip to the Pico Salvaguardia / Pic de Sauvegarde is mentioned on many hiking pages as a daytrip and the starting point is La Besurta. A road goes straight from Benasque to La Besurta, and it takes 23 minutes by bus. As far as I could find out, this service is only available in summer.
From La Besurta to the top of the Salvaguardia, the hike is 2 hours 30 minutes in summer.
Map starting at La Besurta:
![]()
The purple track goes to Pico Salvaguardia, and the Refuge de Benasque where she was planning to go is in red, from Puerto de Benasque.
Did Esther take the track from La Besurta? or another starting point?
How did she get there?
Why was she so late?
The hiker who took her back to Benasque had possibly parked his car at Llanos del Hospital, a ski resort. No snow for skiing as of yet.
I'm glad police are trying to establish this timeline, but I don't think the Sun is a good source to do it.Missing Brit Esther Dingley's photo diary feared to be timeline to tragedy
"Police are using experts to examine her Instagram photos to unravel the 24 hours before she disappeared
The last picture Esther is thought to have taken shows her at the summit, with a solar panel and a telecommunications mast on the peak reflected in her sunglasses.
(…)
It is slightly different from the one she posted the previous day, in that she is wearing an open-necked top and carrying a rucksack with the water tube clearly visible.
A source said: “The last photo is taken later in the day, as the shadow is higher on the slope. That would suggest she went up to the Pic de Sauvegarde twice — which leads to the question, why go up to the same spot twice in 24 hours?”
I disagree with the source. I am 100% convinced in my own judgement that the two photos were taken on the same day. The sky on the horizon seems to have an identical quality. I think even the same stray hair is glistening on her forehead, tuft of loose hair on top right of her head, and her water tube is there it's just more hidden in the second photo because of the angle of the photo. I don't believe it would have still been that bright of light at the top on the Sunday, given the time of her passing the hikers at 3pm and having more than an hour's trek ahead.Missing Brit Esther Dingley's photo diary feared to be timeline to tragedy
"Police are using experts to examine her Instagram photos to unravel the 24 hours before she disappeared
The last picture Esther is thought to have taken shows her at the summit, with a solar panel and a telecommunications mast on the peak reflected in her sunglasses.
(…)
It is slightly different from the one she posted the previous day, in that she is wearing an open-necked top and carrying a rucksack with the water tube clearly visible.
A source said: “The last photo is taken later in the day, as the shadow is higher on the slope. That would suggest she went up to the Pic de Sauvegarde twice — which leads to the question, why go up to the same spot twice in 24 hours?”
Snipped for focusIt is slightly different from the one she posted the previous day, in that she is wearing an open-necked top and carrying a rucksack with the water tube clearly visible.
A source said: “The last photo is taken later in the day, as the shadow is higher on the slope. That would suggest she went up to the Pic de Sauvegarde twice — which leads to the question, why go up to the same spot twice in 24 hours?”
I disagree with the source. I am 100% convinced in my own judgement that the two photos were taken on the same day. The sky on the horizon seems to have an identical quality. I think even the same stray hair is glistening on her forehead, tuft of loose hair on top right of her head, and her water tube is there it's just more hidden in the second photo because of the angle of the photo. I don't believe it would have still been that bright of light at the top on the Sunday, given the time of her passing the hikers at 3pm and having more than an hour's trek ahead.
these are the two photos side by side to save searching back through the thread
Snipped for focus
To me, the hose looks visible in both photos.
I can't cut and past the timeline from that article, but it indicates that she climbed Sauveguard on the 21st and again on the 22nd.A half decent report by the DM with a few new bits of info:
- Esther also spoke to her father, Henry, before setting off up the mountain, phoning to tell him of the preparations she had made. 'She told him she was preparing for her last hike before heading home to Dan,' says her aunt. 'She'd got all the right clothes and equipment and she knew where she was going. She was looking forward to it.'
- By the beginning of 2014, Dan was receiving counselling for depression while Esther had been diagnosed with chronic fatigue, sparked by her own mental health struggles.
- Pierre Gaillard, deputy commander of the French high-mountain gendarmerie platoon, says the last time Esther's phone was active was when she called Dan just before 4pm on November 22. 'There is no data use or GPS trace since then,' he adds.
- Conditions were clear and there was still at least an hour-and-a-half of daylight left — plenty of time for the highly experienced hiker and trail runner to reach the mountain-side cabin where she was planning to spend the night. There is no evidence, however, that she ever got there.
Forensic reconstruction of hiker Esther Dingley's disappearance in the Pyrenees is revealed | Daily Mail Online
- The granddaughter of World War II hero Warwick Dingley, who was awarded the Military Cross for his service in Italy [...] her skills as a rower saw her representing Great Britain in the Junior European Cup.
I disagree with the source. I am 100% convinced in my own judgement that the two photos were taken on the same day. The sky on the horizon seems to have an identical quality. I think even the same stray hair is glistening on her forehead, tuft of loose hair on top right of her head, and her water tube is there it's just more hidden in the second photo because of the angle of the photo. I don't believe it would have still been that bright of light at the top on the Sunday, given the time of her passing the hikers at 3pm and having more than an hour's trek ahead.
these are the two photos side by side to save searching back through the thread
![]()
![]()