- Aug 3, 2008
- Reaction score
It is clear this judge does absolutely no critical thinking in making any rulings. The fact that he even mentioned the WS post relying solely on the State's assertion that it was JW is mindboggling. For crying out loud, I could have registered as JW and made the post he made.
...or someone from the State could have made that posting, for that matter. (I am NOT suggesting that's what happened here. I think JW probably did post that and that it was an absolutely BONEHEADED thing to do.) I'm just saying it should be verified that JW indeed made the posting if it was considered in Gessner's ruling.