Who is this witness? If he is a Cisco employee he sure is playing dumb. Obviously every interface will have a unique MAC address.
Project manager, not an engineer.
Better to get that testimony from networking expert.
Who is this witness? If he is a Cisco employee he sure is playing dumb. Obviously every interface will have a unique MAC address.
FYI no such thing as a PXE firewall.
Carry on
Just in general, who's not to say that they woke at 7, JA said we need to move the furniture, NC is coming to paint. They could have been lying in bed talking. I don't find this at all earth shattering.
From a juror's standpoint, IMHO, the hour's difference on when the Adams got up on that Saturday, isn't going to be a big deal. Seven or eight is early for a Saturday morning, no matter which way you say it.
JMHO
fran
Just in general, who's not to say that they woke at 7, JA said we need to move the furniture, NC is coming to paint. They could have been lying in bed talking. I don't find this at all earth shattering.
Just in general, who's not to say that they woke at 7, JA said we need to move the furniture, NC is coming to paint. They could have been lying in bed talking. I don't find this at all earth shattering.
My point exactly. It isn't like they were 4-5 hours off.
Something (be it a piece of computer equipment or anything else) isn't 'missing' until one goes to look for it and isn't able to find it. THEN it takes on the label of 'missing.' One may find it or one may never find it.
Greg M. wasn't looking for that 3825 router until someone asked him to. He looked. He can't find it. He found reference to it in a chat log with BC. He found the box for it. It's not in the lab, it's not in any of the 3 storage closets he/his group uses.
Thus, it's missing.
Think he meant a "PEX firewall"
The importance of whether it was 7 or 8 goes towards casting doubt on the painting plans;
If NC was planning to come paint, then it reasons they should be up before 8, not at 8.
this is why the pros put the witness onm the stand IMO - to support that they were anticipating NC coming to paint at 8.
Who's "conspiracy" theory are you commenting on?
There is a difference between conspiring (would involve all these entities colluding) and the concept that one or more could have mishandled evidence - intentionally or not - independent of one another.
I don't there are any posters suggesting that group you mention acted in unison, and I think its both disingenuous (and suggestive of a lack of understanding) to say so.
FYI no such thing as a PXE firewall.
Carry on
FYI no such thing as a PXE firewall.
Carry on
The importance of whether it was 7 or 8 goes towards casting doubt on the painting plans;
If NC was planning to come paint, then it reasons they should be up before 8, not at 8.
this is why the pros put the witness onm the stand IMO - to support that they were anticipating NC coming to paint at 8.
Project manager, not an engineer.
Better to get that testimony from networking expert.