Normal for who, you? Certainly not normal for me, in fact I've left a few relationships because of exactly that kind of interchange and I wouldn't hesitate to leave my current 30 yr marriage if it got like that.
As for the "cherry picking" as you call it, I had initially asked a question of minor to which your buddy and then you jumped all over me, now that's what I call cherry picking.
I note neither of you responded when I queried initially to the implication that these interviews that the doctors had with 16 friends and family "close" to OP were not objective enough to be taken as fact, let alone that from the psychologist's report, it sounds pretty obvious it was all OP's version, I certainly didn't hear/read anything in there that would have come from say, the Myers, or ST.
It was confirmed that the only ex gf that was interviewed was in fact one of OP's biggest supporters and what relevance she would have had to what transpired in the three months before RS was killed I certainly can't comprehend, unless she was the "rabbit" reference and perhaps the catalyst to what happened that night. As for the rest, did any of them have anything to lose if OP is found guilty or even incompetent enough to require hospitalization? Objectivity as to who and what was used as reference is key. Just like a computer, only the data input can be analyzed.
