More genuine that anyone else I've seen in the media. That's not to say I agree with everything he said, but I do think he had some valuable insight.
Although apparently detectives say they stand by their warrant. They believe it is Maleahs DNA they found. I doubt they would mistake the brothers DNA for hers.
They also say they stand by the search of the mail route, despite his claim that he never had one.
All the evidence he claims does not exist has been proven and verified by LE, and none of his assumptions or theories are backed by evidence. There is no proof that an insurance policy exists, or that the kidnapping was a set up, or that there was any kidnapping at all for that matter.
He may be right about the abuse allegations, but there is no evidence of
CPS being involved until his son came into BB's life.
There is no doubt that these children may have been abused and neglected, but DV is not an innocent in all of this.
It's natural to want to defend your own child but he clearly does not understand or has not done his research on the evidence against DV.
