I’m well aware that it’s an exchange of ideas. Part of exchanging ideas is to challenge ideas that you think may not fit or if you don’t understand the rationale. I guarantee you that is what an investigative team does as they sit around a conference table discussing the case. And that brings us back to the unanswered question I asked - why is the cash-motivated burglar theory so much less believable to you than your own theory? It is a serious question, asked respectfully. This case might end up being about something completely out of left field that none of us here have even thought of. But, if we are looking at probabilities and likelihood’s, aren’t there scenarios that are more likely than others?
Granted, The cop outfit already has us in unusual territory. But does that make other elements of the crime MORE likely to be unusual, or LESS likely to be unusual?
As an example, the Pike County murders in Ohio where numerous members of a family were murdered one night at a few different locations one after the other. That was unusual, and then we found out that these people were big time into growing marijuana so it seemed possible that this was something related to their illicit activity.
It turned out that it was a custody dispute within the family, and that is all it was. Something common, not unusual as a motive for violence.
So the idea I’m batting around here is, after we identify an unusual aspect of the Bevers murder - the cop outfit - and let’s also throw in the fact that it is in a church although more and more churches are being burglarized - does that make it more likely that other elements of this case are going to turn out to be pretty mundane rather than unusual? Because the more unusual elements we stack together in one case, the less realistic it seems.
The YouTube video/interview/ discussion were great!
I wish I had seen it earlier.
Putting a visual to it makes all the difference. I continue to search for the photo that I saw in my first search for Missy Bevers that was a close up of the SP, the upperface, eyes. Maybe it was bogus. Do you know if there is such a photo?
It was very washed out in brightness and reflection.
Next, Thank you for the shout out for Pike County Rhoden Murders, with 4 Wagner's arrested.
Please pop over there if you can add your experience to the wide speculation regarding the W family. Motive is now known as child custody, but there could be long standing animosity between the two families. Really a Hatfield and Mc Coy situation.MO.
I wish Chris M could talk about it from his perspective, So, if you have the ability to tell him - his knowledge would be appreciated.
JW ( father of the child) has pled guilty to shooting 5 of 8 with agreement that his truthful testimony will remove DP for himself his family members.
The other 3 W's have yet to accept the plea deal that removes DP. Plea deal details are an interpretation of an unseen but verbalized court statement. My opinion.
Plea deal OR go to trial.
You and Chris might appreciate the complexity.
Thanks again for all you do.
Final. Is there a link to Part 1 Video?
All respect to you and those on this thread.
I don't mean to derail this thread with Pike County so I won't mention it again.