GUILTY UK - Agnes Akom, 20, Cricklewood London, 9 May 2021 *arrest*

Both shocking and tragic.

Was the nature of the relationship between Agnes and her killer ever established?

Was there only his word regarding their relationship or was there independent corroboration.

The police said that Agnes was vulnerable. Apart from her age, was any other factor disclosed?

RIP Agnes Dora Akom. I wish life had been kind to you.
 
Both shocking and tragic.

Was the nature of the relationship between Agnes and her killer ever established?

Was there only his word regarding their relationship or was there independent corroboration.

The police said that Agnes was vulnerable. Apart from her age, was any other factor disclosed?

RIP Agnes Dora Akom. I wish life had been kind to you.

Ágnes was a sex worker.

Man, 63, is charged with murder of missing Hungarian woman, 20

Very glad justice has now been done on her behalf.
 
Ágnes was a sex worker.

Man, 63, is charged with murder of missing Hungarian woman, 20

Very glad justice has now been done on her behalf.
The police made a point of saying there was no evidence of Agnes being a sex worker or drug user.

However, we now live in a world where the Met Police are terrified of being accused of victim blaming/shaming and make statements, which fail to both speak the truth and highlight what we can all do to reduce the likelihood of becoming victims of crime.
 
Last edited:
The police made a point of saying there was no evidence of Agnes being a sex worker or drug user.

However, we now live in a world where the Met Police are terrified of being accused of victim blaming/shaming and make statements, which fail to both speak the truth and highlight what we can all do to reduce the likelihood of becoming victims of crime.

I'm not sure even the DM would have said it without evidence, and I have to say that having thoroughly looked through her multiple social media accounts I thought there was plenty. What has come out at trial only reinforces that impression, in terms of the circumstances and apparent history between them, none of which is to imply at all that she deserved anything that happened to her because she plainly did not.

What is more likely imo is that the police knew that confirming anything of that nature could have a massively negative impact on the original investigation, and perhaps subsequently mobilise any prejudices the jury might have. I would be surprised if the jury were so naive as to overlook the possibility (at the very least) so fortunately that appears to have been a groundless fear.

I followed Ágnes' case closely from start to finish and was shocked at how little media interest it generated, considering she was a young, pretty girl, that there were lots of pictures of her, both in general, and also from CCTV of her last movements, and that she was missing for a substantial time before her body was found. (I'm not saying being young and pretty should be a criterion for media interest, just that we all know it is.) Reluctantly, I came to the conclusion that the lack of coverage was most likely connected with her work.

Whatever the truth of it, she was a beautiful young woman with her whole life ahead of her, who endured a horrible, untimely death at the hands of a revolting misogynist, who now thankfully will spend most of the rest of his life locked up in prison. It's no consolation to her family, but at least is the right outcome. So well done to the police and CPS for that.

JMO
 
I'm not sure even the DM would have said it without evidence, and I have to say that having thoroughly looked through her multiple social media accounts I thought there was plenty. What has come out at trial only reinforces that impression, in terms of the circumstances and apparent history between them, none of which is to imply at all that she deserved anything that happened to her because she plainly did not.

What is more likely imo is that the police knew that confirming anything of that nature could have a massively negative impact on the original investigation, and perhaps subsequently mobilise any prejudices the jury might have. I would be surprised if the jury were so naive as to overlook the possibility (at the very least) so fortunately that appears to have been a groundless fear.

I followed Ágnes' case closely from start to finish and was shocked at how little media interest it generated, considering she was a young, pretty girl, that there were lots of pictures of her, both in general, and also from CCTV of her last movements, and that she was missing for a substantial time before her body was found. (I'm not saying being young and pretty should be a criterion for media interest, just that we all know it is.) Reluctantly, I came to the conclusion that the lack of coverage was most likely connected with her work.

Whatever the truth of it, she was a beautiful young woman with her whole life ahead of her, who endured a horrible, untimely death at the hands of a revolting misogynist, who now thankfully will spend most of the rest of his life locked up in prison. It's no consolation to her family, but at least is the right outcome. So well done to the police and CPS for that.

JMO
Agree with everything above and would add that lack of coverage is also down to the fact that she wasn’t British born, had been in the UK for just a few years, hence no extended family or wide circle of local friends/neighbours to remember her on social media. I wonder if her partner was aware of her lifestyle or if she managed to kept it secret.
 
Sentencing him to life imprisonment, the Common Serjeant of London Judge Richard Marks said: "What truly happened there and why you did what you did is something that we can only surmise.

"Tragically, she never lived to tell the tale, so the court and the jury only had your account which I am certain was demonstrably untrue and which the jury not surprisingly rejected."You are physically a much larger person than her, she being around 5ft 5inches and eight and a half stone.

"For reasons only known to yourself, you launched into a vicious attack hitting her over the head at least 20 times with a handheld power tool, an electric jigsaw using at least moderate force and it was quite a heavy object and you also caused her a fracture to the nose which according to the pathologist required severe force."She had no defensive injuries so you must have caught her unawares and thereafter rendered her incapable of even raising her arms in an attempt to defend herself. It must have been a shocking scene. This attack caused a great deal of bleeding. You then set about a comprehensive exercise in an attempt to cover up what you had done."

'Shocking acts of wickedness'

He continued: "It is clear from your lengthy evidence, you remained in a complete state of denial as to what you did in that frenzy of violence that took away that young girl's life at the age of 20.

"These were shocking acts of wickedness on your behalf. Why did it happen? Perhaps, but I cannot be sure, but as you would tell the police ‘She said don’t touch me. She didn’t feel like it, she was in a mood, she told me to leave her alone’. Or perhaps because you were tired of her constant requests for money, you felt like you were being used."Stating that Paizan had not shown “one iota of remorse”, he sentenced him to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 22 years.


BBM.
 
A man has been jailed for murdering a woman who was found buried in Neasden.
Neculai Paizan, 64 (11.11.57) of Peel Street, W8 was sentenced at the Old Bailey on Monday, 25 July to life imprisonment, to serve a minimum of 22 years, for the murder of Agnes Akom.
He was found guilty at the same court on Tuesday, 19 July.
During the sentencing, HHJ Marks praised the ‘outstanding police team,’ adding: “This is police work of the highest order and we are proud and have a debt of gratitude to the team.”
Detective Chief Inspector Neil John, said: “Our thoughts remain with Agnes’ family and friends, who not only have suffered from her loss, but have had to endure hearing the details of her murder during this trial.
“The level of violence Paizan used in his attack on Agnes was truly horrific. What she suffered inside the container does not bear thinking about. Whilst it is not clear why he killed her that day, his attempts to hide his crime in the following hours and days show a calculated effort to ensure that, not only was Agnes never found, but that he would not be caught.
“Our enquiries, which started with phone data, quickly led us to identify Paizan as someone who had regular contact with Agnes. It was his actions that made him a suspect, and the resulting investigation led to him being charged.
“During his testimony at the Old Bailey, Paizan concocted a number of stories in an attempt to paint Agnes in a bad light. Our investigation, and what we know about Agnes, tell us that whilst she was vulnerable, he has clearly lied about her background and personal situation in an attempt to sway the jury.
“It is likely that he preyed upon these vulnerabilities to abuse her, ultimately leading to her murder.”
On 11 May 2021, 20-year-old Agnes, who was also known as ‘Dora’, was reported missing to police. She had left her home in the Cricklewood Broadway area two days earlier and had not been heard from.
Officers launched a missing person investigation and issued a number of appeals for information to find her but she failed to make contact, and no one reported having seen her.
Due to growing concerns for Agnes’ welfare, the investigation was passed to detectives from the Specialist Crime Command who have expertise in cases of this nature.
Officers were able to establish that Agnes had got into a motor vehicle on Cricklewood Broadway on 9 May 2021, which was quickly established as belonging to the defendant. This vehicle was then tracked by police to a makeshift home inside a large shipping container, which was situated at on North Acton Road in Brent.
An extensive review of her phone records, and call data, also established that Agnes’ phone had regularly been in the vicinity of a phone belonging to Paizan over a 12-month period.
On 18 May 2021, officers visited the shipping container to speak with Paizan. Upon arrival, several heavy duty padlocks had been used to secure a door at the end of the container. The London Fire Brigade were requested to attend the container and quickly gained entry. No one was found inside. However, whilst in attendance the defendant arrived on scene believing that his container was on fire. He admitted knowing Agnes and initially said that he had met with her about two weeks earlier.
He was taken to Wembley Police Station in order to give a witness statement, whilst other officers viewed CCTV footage of the industrial estate to corroborate his account. In interview, Paizan said that he had actually taken Agnes to his container on 9 May 2021, where after a short stay within, he had dropped her to a nearby cashpoint machine, after which time he had not seen or heard from her.
Whilst the CCTV footage confirmed that Paizan and Agnes had entered the container on 9 May 2021, it ominously did not show her leaving at any time after that day.
As a result of inconsistencies in his statement, when compared with the visual evidence, Paizan was arrested on suspicion of murder and false imprisonment.
Detectives continued to review the CCTV footage and gradually pieced together Paizan’s movements in the days after Agnes had gone missing. He was seen to carry a number of items from the container to his car before visiting a skip and Neasden Recreation Ground.
Inside the skip, officers found Agnes’ coat. At the same, a full forensic examination of the container found blood which matched Agnes’ DNA. Other bloodstains were subsequently discovered in Paizan’s car.
All of the facts led officers to conclude that Agnes had come to serious harm. Paizan continued to deny any involvement despite the evidence contradicting his statements. On 23 May 2021, he was charged with murder.
However, detectives were yet to find Agnes’ body. Every piece of information suggested that Paizan had taken her to the area surrounding the recreation ground.
Officers with specialist dogs continued with their search, and on 14 June 2021 - some 36 days after she had last been seen - two police dogs gave an indication at a fallen tree. Hidden below a pile of logs and branches, officers found human remains that were later identified as Agnes.
The post-mortem examination established that Agnes had suffered blunt force trauma to the head, having been struck at least 20 times.
DCI John added: “The work of my team in reviewing hours of CCTV footage, as well as that of our forensic colleagues in examining the crime scene – which Paizan had tried to clean – was vital in establishing what happened to Agnes. This evidence was so strong that we were able to charge him with murder prior to us finding Agnes.”

 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
167
Guests online
1,441
Total visitors
1,608

Forum statistics

Threads
594,827
Messages
18,013,415
Members
229,522
Latest member
rypie15
Back
Top