The fact it was so quickly linked to Andrew’s case by police really made me think they had solid evidence the two were involved in his disappearance, but the fact we’re 18 months down the line with no further information is super confusing.
Hard disagree here, especially when it comes to things like human trafficking, or (as an example) the dark web, or people suspected of a multitude of crimes. Investigations frequently span years.
Some late night thoughts
If I came into a lot of money I would give a portion to Kevin to fund a reward / significant media appeal for Andrew.
Bag & Shirt
I believe a TV case appeal should focus on jogging anyone’s memories about his bag at the time as it contained numerous distinctive badges, and also his t-shirt on the day he went missing.
I wonder has anyone ever bought / seen his t-shirt for sale online in the years after his disappearance? It was very common to sell previous band, football, etc t-shirts on EBay in used etc. Although I imagine if so, they would have long thrown it out by now. But I’m sure someone would remember buying it at the time.
Snipped in order to reply to the shirt.
I was 14 in 2007 as well. Slipknot shirts were not uncommon amongst my peers, and kids older and even a bit younger.
I feel strongly that this could've easily been purchased at a local Hot Topic, and I tragically don't think it's reasonable for someone to find purchasing a secondhand Slipknot shirt years ago, extremely memorable.
*The following is separate from the quoted post/my post/the picture*
In addition to the police statement about clearing the two men, there is this-
Andrew’s parents, Kevin and Glenys Gosden, have today released the following statement: “As a family, we wish to extend our thanks to DCI Andy Knowles and his team for carrying out such a comprehensive investigation. It is reassuring to know that any possible leads relating to Andrew’s disappearance in 2007 continue to be dealt with in a thorough and professional manner.
“Our hearts go out to the men who have been exonerated of any involvement in Andrew’s disappearance. They have no connection to our missing son and we feel profoundly sorry for the inevitable distress that such allegations will have caused.
“The past months of this investigation have been a period of additional difficulty for our family, intensifying our sense of living in limbo, not knowing what happened to our much-loved son. We are grateful to South Yorkshire Police for helping us to draw a line under this specific aspect as a result of their time-consuming and considered approach to the investigation.
“As a family, our emotional reaction is to feel that, after so much effort over the past 16 years, we remain no closer to discovering what has happened to Andrew. We should like to thank the media and the public for their support and help for so many years, but ask that our privacy is respected.
“The essentials of Andrew’s case remain unchanged and we have nothing further to add. We do not wish to participate in any interview at this time and consider the matter closed, thanks to the painstaking work of the police.
“Details of Andrew’s case are readily available online and as always, we continue to appeal to the public to pass any information they may have to Missing People (116000) or to the police (101).
“Thank you for your understanding at this difficult time.”
-
You can just hear that Kevin is crushed. I wish I could hug him. This statement hurts just to read, and in pure Gosden family form, he thinks of the men affected by the investigation and wishes them healing. This horrible thing couldn't have happened to a better family, truly, and it's heartbreaking.
"Mr Gosden said: 'It was just so, so normal in our house, in our family, until he vanished. You go over and over, in your mind, all the possibilities that might exist for why he might have chosen to disappear, and we can’t come up with anything at all.'"
I know in this article his father meant *if he chose* to disappear. I don't think that is what Andrew wanted (chose) to happen, though.
I was recently reading an unrelated case in which a mistrial was declared, because after 3 years of trying, the F.B.I. had finally cracked the code to open a victim's cell phone while a trial was already underway. So there may be hope yet, that the devices seized in Andrew's case will have needed information on them. In other words, investigators may still be trying to get all of the data... JMO/IMO.
I know it's unrelated, but could you please link it? That's very interesting.
https://www.southyorks.police.uk/fi...=Facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=Orlo