I assume the "duty of care" is to the "potential victim" rather than the family. Hence the role of the Police Liaison Officer.
Their role is "as described on the tin". That being, keeping the family informed as to the developments in the case, rather than letting them dictate the pace and direction of an investigation.
Which is bizarre, in this situation.
I noted TW's comments in an TV interview. He was almost dictating what he believed was the issues. And it was kind of bizarre for a couple of reasons. More so "what was not said" rather than "what he did say".
He basically ruled out terrorism on logical grounds, but lumped in terrorism with AWOL.
He said that AWOL would be something that was either pre-planned so therefore would leave a trail or was on the spur of the moment, due to an instant response to a situation (say if someone "broke" for a better word). He noted that in Corrie's case, neither applied.
I like how AWOL was put together with Terrorism.
He then spoke about other possible situations. They were either that Corrie was taken forcefully or that an accident befell him and he was already dead.
Can see the pattern there !
He never mentions a "pre planned meeting, wherein Corrie went off with someone willingly....yet recklessly".
Lumping "AWOL" in with "Terrorism", places "both" as "outliers". That then gets accept as so, and forgotten.
The simple truth is....we don't know. And neither does he.
If you take the "stats" on young soldiers, "AWOL" has a much higher likelihood of happening than "Terrorism". Infact Terrorism would rank at the bottom, whereas AWOL would rank at the top.
But we'll ignore the stats and look at the situation. And here the possibility of Corrie meeting someone known to him (be that briefly or for awhile) is ignored completely. It's a "no issue".
Effectively, he presents four options. Terror (X), AWOtL (X), Being Taken (?) or Accident (?). That's the menu on offer. Pick one.
I can imagine the police being directly in conflict with this approach. And possibly even "unwilling" to deal with him.
<modsnip> I think this is why the Police are being so heavily criticised, because they remain open minded. This, without evidence is exactly how the Police should treat this investigation.