I thought she was much better and much more precise. Especially on the CCTV footage.Yep, I noticed that too. The Superintendent seems a wee bit imprecise with language. JMO
I thought she was much better and much more precise. Especially on the CCTV footage.Yep, I noticed that too. The Superintendent seems a wee bit imprecise with language. JMO
Yes so that’s the path she entered the fields on, which we said in earlier threads - looks quite wooded along there. Still struggling to see how any perp would have got her out of the area unless in a car on Blackpool lane (and without being seen at all). IMO.Garstang Lane is the riverside path leading to the inner/upper field it's not a road. You won't find it on Google Maps. That's the mistake I was making. But if you listen to SI Riley she clearly said Garstang leading to A 586. Garstang Lane is the red dotted line on the screenshot provided.
Do you have a link to sayI think this will be because the dog harness which was found on the river bank was wet. This would be because the owner had gone down to the edge to get it, slipped into the water accidentally then thrown the harness onto the bank so as to be able to use both hands to get out of the River.
Very sadly, IMO, this attempt to get out was not successful.
It's awful but IMO she is in the deep hole part of the River somewhere. There is a fair chance that sonar is not the answer for this. I don't care how much the computer kit cost it is how well it works in reality that matters rather than the dollar value.
(Edit for typo)
Do you have a link saying the harness was wet?I think this will be because the dog harness which was found on the river bank was wet. This would be because the owner had gone down to the edge to get it, slipped into the water accidentally then thrown the harness onto the bank so as to be able to use both hands to get out of the River.
Very sadly, IMO, this attempt to get out was not successful.
It's awful but IMO she is in the deep hole part of the River somewhere. There is a fair chance that sonar is not the answer for this. I don't care how much the computer kit cost it is how well it works in reality that matters rather than the dollar value.
(Edit for typo)
Yes. That's where she entered the field from. It would be a long way for a perp to walk her there or even if she walked herself for someone not to have spotted her.Yes so that’s the path she entered the fields on, which we said in earlier threads - looks quite wooded along there. Still struggling to see how any perp would have got her out of the area unless in a car on Blackpool lane (and without being seen at all). IMO.
Again, LE have stated that they can use 3rd party apps to obtain data...
No. It is strictly MOO.Do you have a link to say
Do you have a link saying the harness was wet?
That doesn't mean she wore them every day for every call. The official description of what Nicola was wearing did not include earphones and we have no way of knowing if she had them on or even with her when she went missing.
MOO
Exactly right I think. There's no evidence it's a crime but reason to think she may have stumbled into that river, hence they pursue that.I don’t think it’s that they can’t see that it could be a crime but that there’s no evidence to suggests it is at the moment.
Yes I agree which leads us back to the police theory of an accidental fall into the river or foul play in the field but ultimately ending up in the river. IMO.Yes. That's where she entered the field from. It would be a long way for a perp to walk her there or even if she walked herself for someone not to have spotted her.
Think she said that dayI was shocked when I heard 700 vehicles, doesn’t that seem incredibly high for a village road? Is that over the space of an hour or what? Which would be 11 cars a minute? Or over a smaller length of time?
She had earphones, wired ,FB pics
Do we know for sure that the harness was wet?I think this will be because the dog harness which was found on the river bank was wet. This would be because the owner had gone down to the edge to get it, slipped into the water accidentally then thrown the harness onto the bank so as to be able to use both hands to get out of the River.
Very sadly, IMO, this attempt to get out was not successful.
It's awful but IMO she is in the deep hole part of the River somewhere. There is a fair chance that sonar is not the answer for this. I don't care how much the computer kit cost it is how well it works in reality that matters rather than the dollar value.
(Edit for typo)
Because mis-adventure is a hard pill to swallow...it always feels majorly avoidable and is just a little "Final Destination"Huge respect to the Moderators.
My feeling is that she ended up in the water as the result of an accident. I hope the search teams find her so that, as sad as it is, she can at least go home, and there can be some degree of closure for the family.
But for some reason, I am not optimistic. This reminds me a little of the Corrie McKeague case, in which the landfill he should have been found in was searched extensively and yet his remains were not located. Which settles nothing and leaves everyone involved in an agonising state of not knowing for sure.
I wonder if it’s a regional/local way of saying it, as “socks tucked into jeans” obviously doesn’t really make sense (unless the jeans are turned up at the hem, with the socks tucked into the turn-ups, but that wouldn’t even be visible and would look the same as jeans tucked into socks.)Agree but taken with other inconsistencies it's an indication of not-quite-100% attention to detail overall, which is concerning in a case like this. There's no reason to get a detail like that wrong now as we have all seen the CCTV images of what NB was actually wearing. These slips and small errors are all part of the bigger picture. JMO.
I think that if the police truly believed that there was a criminal element to this investigation, they would have released better, clearer and more photos of both NB and the clothes she was wearing on the day (or similar clothes). At least, I would like to hope that's what they would have done.If LE have any Fitbit data to suggest NB entered the water, what do they have to gain by keeping that confidential ? I'm not saying they don't have data - just trying to work out why not release that info?
I am astounded by the lack of visual help the police are giving out to the public/MSM when doing these press conferences and asking for help. We live (unfortunately) in a quick fix, visual world (there's a reason why Instagram is so popular) so why not some kind of visual presentation clearly showing the lane/road they need still need dashcam footage from? It would make everything so much clearer.
Similarly when describing NB's outfit. Why not use clear pictures of the clothes or better still produce some exact replicas.....in last Fridays press conference LE asked for the public to pay special attention to the clothes NB was wearing.....
No I live in a village and they’re rat runs at peak times. In fact I think that’s low.I was shocked when I heard 700 vehicles, doesn’t that seem incredibly high for a village road? Is that over the space of an hour or what? Which would be 11 cars a minute? Or over a smaller length of time?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.