<modsnip: quoted post was removed> Just my opinion- but I actually feel as though whilst she is the accused; his involvement with her is bound to be questionable, and quite rightly so.
I must ask why it’s ok to listen/read about her colleagues interactions and their squabbles and “bitchiness” and what it was over and the dynamics of these friendships- but not to question the interactions between her and dr choc (whether it was romantic or not).
The very fact she called specifically for “that” doctor when another doctor had arrived to attend to baby P I think?, it must be considered “why” was his attendance specifically relevant and how did it contribute to the case as a whole. Because she was sweet, crushing on him, because he clearly was quite fond of her. We then see that emotional connection where for whatever reason, she (they) are sharing this very interpersonal emotional grief together. Shared common ground that no-one else understands.
Isn’t this what she was trying to do with Mel? It was discussed by message to JJK, “no-one else understands”. Poor you, bad luck, on your shift again etc
She even wanted to talk to Mel about such loss (that shared grief) and apparently Mel wouldn’t.
It may have become a shenanigan with dr choc later on, but we get to see how through his perusal of her through flattery and chocolates etc, he clearly very much liked her, spent time in London with her, sending love emojis, swooning- to me he appears to be almost like this “suitable” aid in sharing the grief and giving her that sympathy she appeared to crave so much.
In the grand scheme of things and every other interaction and activity with colleagues, messages, days out and messaging her mum, keeping hand over sheets at both her home address and her parents etc; the interaction with dr choc and that “why” imo is significant to the case. Regardless, dr choc I’m sure will have his own questions to be accountable for.
JMO MOO
