FWIW and it’s JMO it’s an error to try and reconcile all the witness sightings of Suzy on that Monday.
As suggested, if you make a timeline it’s apparent that they all can’t be accurate.
Regardless of your opinion of DV’s narrative, he has realised this and with good research applied logic to decide where he thought Suzy was going.
Unless his prime suspect has a motive, or DV has more evidence that’s not in his book, his prime suspect just doesn’t hold up.
If you’re going to come up with a workable narrative, you need to decide which sightings you believe to be correct and go from there.
I believe BW to be correct and as has been pointed out in recent posts, this sighting may have sealed her fate.
I agree with what you say about the witness sightings and timelines
@Terryb808:
So much so that yesterday evening i had a look in AS book about WJ and her view on the white Ford Fiesta being parked on Stevenage Road (pages 26 - 27).
In the Crimewatch reconstruction (1986), WJ can be seen leaving her property around 12.45 to go to the bank, and she crosses the road before passing the Ford Fiesta, which would indicate she got to have a good look at the car and how it was parked. However, in AS book this isn't actually what happened:
'Mrs Jones told a policeman that the previous day she took her dog for a very brief walk at 12.40, before calling for a neighbour Mrs Mahon. She noticed as she did so a white Ford Fiesta was parked by the Mahon's garage, slightly overlapping the entrance, and wondered whether Mrs Mahon's husband would have dificulty getting his car into the garage that evening.'
So, completely left out of the Crimewatch reconstruction, comes the astonishing news that WJ went out with AM that lunchtime, the very same Mrs M who's husband LM would come home at 5.15 to find the car (still?) parked overlapping the entrance to the garage. I must admit i don't recall reading that bit of information before, and it came as a surprise to me!
Does the fact that WJ knew the garage owners add any credence to her story?
To continue (Page 26):
'The two women then drove to the NatWest Bank by Fulham Cross, where AM was changing a large amount of coins from a pay phone in her house. She was embarrassed taking time doing this when there were other lunchtime customers waiting behind her. She glanced at the bank clock and noticed it was 12.49.'
The way it is written sounds like it was AM, not WJ, who noticed the time on the bank clock. Why has AM never been viewed as an important witness to the car being parked where it was? And the timeline doesn't seem right. Taking the dog for a walk, bringing it home, going to call for AM, getting in the car (who's car was it? where was it parked?), driving to the bank, parking the car, and then going into the bank. Did all that really only take 9 minutes?