Claudia
Member
- Joined
- Feb 1, 2008
- Messages
- 415
- Reaction score
- 5
While I agree with you, I am going to make one point. They haven't said WG is no longer a person of interest, but they never said he was one, so they wouldn't say that, anyway.I have to disagree. I haven't heard the police come right out and say this person is no longer a person of interest. The investigation is not over and I don't believe anything is really ruled out yet, not until they have evidence or have found her. They have no evidence to rule out anything. You can only rule out something if you have proof that they did or did not have anything to do with it. The guy saying he's innocent is not proof.
They're calling him a cooperative witness... I have to believe they have some reason that we're not aware of for them to believe this guy. Then again, maybe they don't believe him, and they're just saying they do because... I don't know why.
My point is, I'm sure that as much info as they've released, I bet they have at least that much more that they haven't released. At this point, I think this could go in any number of directions in the next few days. JMO.