![]()
Pirates of the Caribbean star sidekick 'affairs with vulnerable women'
Beechy Colclough (circled) behind Johnny Depp and lawyer Camille Vasquez at Fairfax County Court last week Johnny Depp is being supported through his bitter libel case by a former celebrity therapistwww.dailymail.co.uk
And in Johnny Depp's corner... the celebrity therapist struck off for seducing his female patients: Pirates of the Caribbean star's shamed sidekick was once outed for his 'affairs with vulnerable women'
Also, if she was truly afraid for her life because he is such a violent abusive threat to her, why would she take humiliating photos and send them to mutual friends, where she mocks and belittles him, using her own account?She not only takes the picture, she then sends it to friends, with the mean caption ='look what I'm dealing with.'
She is married to a handsome, brilliant, rich super star who loves her very much but is dealing with addiction issues, which she knew about from the start---
and she takes humiliating pictures of him and sends them out , knowing they will be passed around.
I don't care what kind of expert in anatomy he is---no one can convince me that I wouldn't seek immediate medical help if I had been in a violent bottle incident. Especially as a young woman who wanted to have children.My first thought is that this anatomy expert is going to testify that there's no need to seek medical attention after the violent bottle incident, nor for feet that are cut up with glass shards.
Ofcourse not...it's ludicrous one wouldn't seek medical attention. If this anatomy person goes anywhere near there with some bandaid or soothing cream business, that expert's reputation would be over.I don't care what kind of expert in anatomy he is---no one can convince me that I wouldn't seek immediate medical help if I had been in a violent bottle incident. Especially as a young woman who wanted to have children.
And I absolutely would not be making coffee for the brutal rapist the next morning.
Meet the attorneys caught in the firing line of the Depp v. Heard culture war
![]()
Meet the attorneys caught in the firing line of the Depp v. Heard culture war
Benjamin Chew and Benjamin Rottenborn are facing off in one of the ugliest celebrity defamation trials in recent memory.news.yahoo.com
I've lost track. Did the jury hear this?AH: That's the difference between me and you, you're a *advertiser censored*king baby.
JD: Because you start physical fights?
AH: You are such a baby! Grow the up Johnny!
JD: Because you start physical fights?
AH: I did start a physical fight.
JD: Yeah, you did. So I had to get the out of there.
No, the jury will have the final word in this trial.OK so I just checked Chanley Painter’s (CourtTV) Twitter feed and it confirms AH’s rebuttal is only in regards to her counterclaim. In either case, she will have the final word in this trial!
I don't care what kind of expert in anatomy he is---no one can convince me that I wouldn't seek immediate medical help if I had been in a violent bottle incident. Especially as a young woman who wanted to have children.
And I absolutely would not be making coffee for the brutal rapist the next morning.
ETA: which brings up another question----why was she even there the next morning?
Your partner brutally rapes you with a liquor bottle and you stay the night and sleep there?????? Who would do that?
Yes, the recording played in court.I've lost track. Did the jury hear this?
Which ‘was bugged’, lol… like anyone has ever said that meant she couldn’t have it de-bugged; and like this means it isn’t sitting in her garage at this instant. (I mean, maybe she can’t; I’m no Tesla wiring expert but it should be broached, IMO.)Until JD’s Range Rover was swapped for the Tesla provided by new beau EM.
There was a trial attorney doing mock cross examination before the AH cross, and he stressed multiple times that the goal would be, just get the questions out there to hang in the ether.I think that was the implication. Sometimes Camille just let there be a pause, to let it sink in. She didn't belabor some points, which I guess is trusting that the jury will come to the same conclusions on their own? Remember we still have rebuttal phase and closing arguments to come, to drive certain points home.
There have never been roots or long strands involved with these pictures, IIRC.Also, if someone is ripping out hair at the roots (in order to cause scalp damage) from the top/back of her head as she claims, it would be long strands! The hair in the photo looks like short tufts of trimmed hair to me.
I know. It seems like nothing more than that good old fashioned ‘henpecked’; or like she’s talking about the dog messing himself.She not only takes the picture, she then sends it to friends, with the mean caption ='look what I'm dealing with.'
She is married to a handsome, brilliant, rich super star who loves her very much but is dealing with addiction issues, which she knew about from the start---
and she takes humiliating pictures of him and sends them out , knowing they will be passed around.
That’s sweet.Meet the attorneys caught in the firing line of the Depp v. Heard culture war
![]()
Meet the attorneys caught in the firing line of the Depp v. Heard culture war
Benjamin Chew and Benjamin Rottenborn are facing off in one of the ugliest celebrity defamation trials in recent memory.news.yahoo.com
Begging to stay, and… thereafter whines to get him (!!) to break the TRO, and let her back in while the TRO is still active.I can't speak to the first part of your post.
However, I can say that many many victims stay because they have no choice.
The problem that I have in this case... AH is begging to stay. There were many many people in that house the day her "hostage situation" ended. She could have bolted for safety while her abuser was being medically treated and couldn't stop her... She didn't. It seemed to me that their own doctor wanted her to leave and she didn't want to.
Moo
You are right, and I absolutely understand that many victims stay because they have no choice. They may have young children, they may have been cut off from any other support, and may be truly in constant physical danger and violence.I can't speak to the first part of your post.
However, I can say that many many victims stay because they have no choice.
The problem that I have in this case... AH is begging to stay. There were many many people in that house the day her "hostage situation" ended. She could have bolted for safety while her abuser was being medically treated and couldn't stop her... She didn't. It seemed to me that their own doctor wanted her to leave (remove her from the situation) and she didn't want to. That doesn't seem like victim behavior to me.
Moo