oh_gal
Active Member
- Joined
- Mar 6, 2009
- Messages
- 5,942
- Reaction score
- 50
Not quite. Doesn't she have black, adopted or foster brothers/sisters? Did I misread the article?
I'm not saying that makes all her claims valid, but it's not quite as random as you make it appear.
I was saying she has no biologically-supported AA DNA. Just as I have no biologically supported Inuit DNA. You can identify with something because you grew up around it, but when it comes to identifying yourself on legally binding paperwork (like a job application that you sign), I believe you need to stick with the cards you've been dealt that can be proven biologically. Can you (legally) mark down on a job application that your gender is M (because that's how you "identify") if you were anatomically, and genetically born a F, and haven't gone through gender reassignment surgery? That's not a rhetorical question. I don't know the answer to that.
If not, this could open up a whole new world.
And if it IS the case that you can mark down whatever you're feeling on a job application, that's one thing. But she went much further. She blatently (as in, knowingly, and without mistake) lied about her heritage, posting pictures of her AA adopted brother off as her own child, and some "random" (he's not saying how they are associated) AA guy off as her "dad". She also posted pictures of herself as recently as her last birthday, going back to her "natural hair" - highlighting, again, her AA DNA, when in truth, her hair is straight and blond, not a dark brown afro. No matter how she tries to spin that, that is not her "natural" hair. Even her mother said they were extensions.
If she hadn't out and out lied, maybe it would be easier to say, "Well, if you want feel you identify with this race or culture, that's your right." It's also your right to lie, I guess, but there are repercussions to that. Sometimes they're legal, sometimes they're social.