mollymalone
Former Member
Would any one be as uncomfortable if LE were watching a group that they thought were stockpiling weapons? Or perhaps had terrorist links? Or merely a different sect that also had a leader with "end of the world" visionary tendencies?
I equate Warren Jeffs with Jim Jones, David Koresh and what's that other guys name, the one that convinced his followers to commit suicide in California to catch a ride on a commet. All of these men molded their followers according to their doctrine, to fit their egos. Jeff's has been asking who among his people would die for him. If you were being asked that by him and you weren't as enamored of him as all that, wouldn't that be a chilling question?
Jeffs was preaching blood atonement with the end hope of being able to resume using that. If he hadn't flown into the proverbial ****fan there's no telling how soon he would have instituted that measure. It was already being used as a threat upon the members to keep them in line. That's even more chilling imo.
Jeffs IMO was so eaten up with power that he thought he truly was untouchable, a God here on earth. His comment below shows he had no intention of giving up that power over the others.
http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/content/fileadmin/oldsite/2004/02/05/cover.html
According to another FLDS member present, Jeffs, after making this announcement, turned to the other men at the gathering: "This is a benevolent dictatorship. But I would like anyway to see a show of hands of those who support me in cutting these men off." Only four men refused to back Jeffs, and the outraged prophet let them know: "God is taking this down." This is an excellent article and I think that erring on the side of caution was
necessary for CPS and LE regarding this group.
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/how-dangerous-flds
How Dangerous is The FLDS? "One of the trickiest parts of dealing with the extremist right is figuring out whether a given group is just harmless garden-variety crazy -- or harboring the special kind of insanity that will lead to acts of local violence or outright domestic terror. it's a question worth asking in the wake of the state of Texas' intervention in the Eldorado colony of the Fundamentalist Church of Latter-Day Saints. As the country is thrust into a fresh debate over individual religious freedom versus our collective interest in protecting people's civil rights, we're struggling once again with the deeper question: When should we leave people alone? And when does the state have a public duty to intervene?"
I equate Warren Jeffs with Jim Jones, David Koresh and what's that other guys name, the one that convinced his followers to commit suicide in California to catch a ride on a commet. All of these men molded their followers according to their doctrine, to fit their egos. Jeff's has been asking who among his people would die for him. If you were being asked that by him and you weren't as enamored of him as all that, wouldn't that be a chilling question?
Jeffs was preaching blood atonement with the end hope of being able to resume using that. If he hadn't flown into the proverbial ****fan there's no telling how soon he would have instituted that measure. It was already being used as a threat upon the members to keep them in line. That's even more chilling imo.
Jeffs IMO was so eaten up with power that he thought he truly was untouchable, a God here on earth. His comment below shows he had no intention of giving up that power over the others.
http://www.lasvegasweekly.com/content/fileadmin/oldsite/2004/02/05/cover.html
According to another FLDS member present, Jeffs, after making this announcement, turned to the other men at the gathering: "This is a benevolent dictatorship. But I would like anyway to see a show of hands of those who support me in cutting these men off." Only four men refused to back Jeffs, and the outraged prophet let them know: "God is taking this down." This is an excellent article and I think that erring on the side of caution was
necessary for CPS and LE regarding this group.
http://www.ourfuture.org/blog-entry/how-dangerous-flds
How Dangerous is The FLDS? "One of the trickiest parts of dealing with the extremist right is figuring out whether a given group is just harmless garden-variety crazy -- or harboring the special kind of insanity that will lead to acts of local violence or outright domestic terror. it's a question worth asking in the wake of the state of Texas' intervention in the Eldorado colony of the Fundamentalist Church of Latter-Day Saints. As the country is thrust into a fresh debate over individual religious freedom versus our collective interest in protecting people's civil rights, we're struggling once again with the deeper question: When should we leave people alone? And when does the state have a public duty to intervene?"