You can't just toss a coin in a matter like this.
It doesn't occur to you that at least 9 out of the 12 grand jurors were confident enough that John assisted. And 9 out of the 12 grand jurors were confident enough that Patsy assisted. If they had reached the same consensus as to who was primarily responsible for the prosecution's Count I of Murder in the First Degree, then the assisting charge against that person would've been dropped.
You have to wonder why JR is still trawling about TV studios offering his paid opinion on this or that regarding his daughter's death?
icedtea4me,
We do not need the GJ to demonstrate that the parents staged the wine-cellar crime-scene.
Its an inescapable conclusion from the forensic evidence they left behind.
There was enough forensic evidence for the GJ to reach a majority on PR killing JonBenet, her fibers are in the ligature knotting, possibly not a smoking gun but good enough to level a Murder1 True Bill.
It's likely the GJ had access to forensic evidence that has never been made public?
Making them think, although its probable one of the parents asphyxiated JonBenet and assisted with the staging, its also possible some
other Ramsey was responsible for initiating the crime, with the parents simply cleaning up and finalising the staging?
Otherwise why do we need the constant reference to the anonymous
person, there are only three candidates on offer, and if you think its a sexually motivated homicide that drops to two?
And from that two, one is named in the True Bills, the other is afforded the luxury of anonymity via Colorado Child Safety Statutes.
If the case were JDI, i.e.
incest, then with JR's fibers found on JonBenet's thighs, the GJ should have had no problem in leveling a True Bill of sexual assault against JR and Murder In The First Degree against Patsy, with both parents guilty of staging a cover up?
You have to wonder why JR is still trawling about TV studios offering his paid opinion on this or that regarding his daughter's death?
Not because the case is JDI, he is just promoting the concerned father line along with hints why it is an IDI case, just in case anything pops up to muddy his alleged narrative.
You know, like the CBS BDI alleging BR whacked JonBenet for stealing some of his pineapple?
.