You know, I am not an attorney, or a chemist, and I did NOT sleep at a Holiday Inn last night, but I can't help but feel that VT just might have a case against JB and the DT. I know, I know! An attorney can't be held liable for what they say in defense of a client. BUT. . . .when that attorney has CLEARLY gone beyond the boundaries of defending a client and has traveled into the land of blatantly lying to clear a client, I feel there just might be a case. Look at what JB has done since this trial started. He has stated as a matter of fact that GA was a child molester that was forcing his daughter to perform unspeakable acts from the age of 8 years old, that LA also was a child molester who had tried to follow his daddy's lead, that RK was a "bankrupt individual" who had stolen a corpse and then proceeded to hide it and move it around because he felt he could use it as a "lottery ticket", and now that a convicted kidnapper, VT, had phone conversations with GA the day before the now infamous 911 call was made. All of this mud thrown without one shred of supporting evidence. The VT calls could have easily been checked out and shown to be a mistake by the DT, and for all we know they were. Yet, they are going to parade the calls in front of the media, and attempt to call this man to the stand in order to throw up a smoke screen. Seriously, if something doesn't happen to JB after this trial, it will be a true miscarriage of justice. If a defense attorney can be allowed to go to such lengths and get away with ruining so many lives without consequence, then there needs to be some serious changes made. JMO.