Why Did Judge Perry Change His Decision about the Myspace posting?

Discussion in 'Caylee Anthony 2 years old' started by whiteangora, May 28, 2011.

  1. whiteangora

    whiteangora I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"

    Messages:
    5,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Judge Perry made a ruling Feb 11, 2011 allowing Cindy's Myspace posting "My Caylee is Missing" to be allowed as evidence at trial. Why did he change his mind now? I'm afraid Baez is going to slowly whittle away at all of the evidence that the jury should be seeing by his constant objections NOW after this stuff was supposed to be admitted.
    Below is a link to JP's ruling to let the Myspace into evidence.
    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26834014/detail.html
     
  2. Loading...


  3. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,162
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    I am still in shock over this. :(
     
  4. whiteangora

    whiteangora I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"

    Messages:
    5,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I'm afraid that this is only the beginning. I understand that JP wants to be cautious and all but imo that Myspace posting by Cindy was a huge piece of the puzzle and illustrated the tensions between Cindy and Casey. I just don't get why JP thought it was ok back in Feb and now all of a sudden it's not.
     
  5. sleutherontheside

    sleutherontheside Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMO HHJP never changed his mind. When HHJP ruled that the Myspace be allowed at trial...he did so with the understanding that proper predicate would be established by the State.

    JB objected to the MySpace entry being admitted at this time. Apparently JB was successful in establishing that the proper predicate had not been established and as JSR stated in another post....it was prejudicial to KC.

    Does that mean that it will never come in? Nope...just not yet.

    HHJP is one of the smartest Judges I have ever seen. His recall of case law is second to none.

    I have no concerns about any of HHJP's rulings because his record is unmatched. He knows best....we must learn patience.

    The SAO will attempt to introduce much more than they need. I have no concerns.
     
  6. Fluffy Puppy

    Fluffy Puppy New Member

    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This sounds right. I was thinking maybe it was just the photo. In any case, I don't think it is forever, we will see it, imo.
     
  7. whiteangora

    whiteangora I'm on the right track baby. I was "Born This Way"

    Messages:
    5,751
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    bbm

    I just re-read the motion and I see nothing about the State having to establish proper predicate. I also heard nothing today indicating that the Myspace could be admitted at a later time. All I heard was "Objection Sustained" in answer to JB's objection. I hope you are right and it will come in at a later time. :smile:
    Link to JP's order allowing the Myspace in Feb, 2001
    http://www.wftv.com/pdf/26834014/detail.html
     
  8. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,162
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Exactly and that's what has me worried. :(
    I just re read it also.
     
  9. sleutherontheside

    sleutherontheside Retired WS Staff

    Messages:
    9,875
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Recall that some of the "party pics" were objected to and sustained by HHJP this week. Then they ended up being used.

    As far as the motion in limine to exclude the myspace posting......it was denied BUT the more I thought about it , IMO because CA stated she had not added the photo of Caylee to the entry...there was a legitimate reason for disallowing it at this time.

    I probably jumped the gun referring to predicate and failed to recognize the issue with the photo.
     
  10. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,162
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Ok, that's correct. She DID SAY that she didn't add the photo. Thanks SOTS ( hate referring to you as that. Mom always called bad people SOTS! :floorlaugh:) , but that actually makes more sense. :)
     
  11. Whome?

    Whome? New Member

    Messages:
    779
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    :blowkiss: Thank you for clearing that up for ME
     
  12. Melanie

    Melanie Inactive

    Messages:
    12,328
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    0
    IMHO, heresay, speculation. At that time Cindy had no clue where Caylee was or what happened to her -- Cindy was merely guessing and searching.

    I don't agree with it, but understand the courts order. IMHO the defense may try to enter it at some point -- not sure.

    MOO

    Mel
     
  13. Chiquita71

    Chiquita71 New Member

    Messages:
    3,835
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    This is regarding LDB and the Myspace questions to Cindy

    HHJP: sustained

    LDB: after you posted that message did you speak to Casey about it?

    a few days before she realized I created the myspace. I never got a response, I asked why she did not respond. She said I was being hard on her, she had told me she did not want to go on myspace. I didn't know it was everybodys space and she explained to me how everybody can get on there.

    LDB: she read your posting?

    yes

    LDB: did you discuss?

    objection
    in reference to the courts ruling
    (side bar)


    LDB: does it represent the text of the message you posted?

    exclusive of the photo? yes

    LDB: (not near mic) does the date and time also accurately reflect when you made the posting?

    maybe a little later but in the evening that day was long for me.

    LDB: the photo that is on that exhibit did you put the photo?

    I didn't I don't know how to post a photo

    objection

    (side bar)


    As far as I know that subject was not brought up again.
     
  14. Tiko44

    Tiko44 Just Me

    Messages:
    128
    Likes Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    0
    I want Casey's poem/reply admitted (everyone lies everyone dies...paraphrased) if CA myspace is admitted will ICA's be as well??
     
  15. RR0004

    RR0004 New Member

    Messages:
    20,001
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Who added a photo?
     
  16. Caligram

    Caligram New Member

    Messages:
    1,264
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    The DT sure is miserly about truth-sharing.
     
  17. Tulessa

    Tulessa Well-Known Member

    Messages:
    22,162
    Likes Received:
    166
    Trophy Points:
    63
    We don't know. All we know is that CA said she didn't know how to do it so apparently it wasn't her.
     
  18. Intermezzo

    Intermezzo Active Member

    Messages:
    10,308
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    38

    He did???....I am SHOCKED :eek:
    I went out yesterday and missed the last 2-3 hours of testimony.
     
  19. Intermezzo

    Intermezzo Active Member

    Messages:
    10,308
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Did Mr Mason bring up some case law or THREATEN the court with a mistrial or going to the Federal Level to complain?
     
  20. Intermezzo

    Intermezzo Active Member

    Messages:
    10,308
    Likes Received:
    37
    Trophy Points:
    38
    Thanks for the enlightenment...I feel better now...I didn't get to see that portion of the testimony.
     
  21. Zoe Bogart

    Zoe Bogart Let's not ask for the Moon, we have the Stars

    Messages:
    4,840
    Likes Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    0
    If I remember correctly, JB stood up and recited his usual case numbers. HHJP called sidebar, and along came Cheney with a huge open book to which he was pointing.
     

Share This Page

  1. This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
    By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
    Dismiss Notice