Hmm, I've only been through Wyoming once but remember the treed bits more than the open bits obviously!
I'd perceived it as being in an area that was difficult to access but if the cops were able to drive their cars to the body that obviously does change some things.
Same for me. I never been in Wyoming, just read an article about Jack's identification and didn't even thought much of it. I thought that I'm glad he got his name back, and assumed that it must be a case of someone getting lost: I mean like some secluded wilderness, guy was trying somewhere in winter, got lost, his car stuck so he got out and tried to find his way to main road on foot, but possibly due to snowstorm, darkness or some other condition he got even more lost, possibly slightly injured and froze to death.
Then I stumbled on the pic with red tape and... OH MY GOD.
Of course, it's still possible that he got lost, wandered there and his car ended up stuck in a place where it's still hidden. Or that his car got stolen before he got lost, or that someone found his abandoned car and stole it... and that the basics of the story are still the same: he got lost and died from the exposure.
But considering this additional details I think that there is a good possibility that foul play was involved.
It's not only that cops were able to access that place with cars. Jack was found by workers who also drove there. And very near the pipeline - that is clearly visible from the surface.
I'd like to know where this pipeline goes.
Cause that looks like two things:
1. Mostly abandoned dirtroad is going along it, possibly used mostly while it was built.
2. Like it could be a point of refference for someone who got lost and walked along it with hope of reaching the city.
Seeing that pipeline and the roads near Granger would tell how likely it is that he ended up led even farther from interstate and Granger.
Maybe I'm looking too deep into this but if relying on odds makes sense with assumming hypothermia just because it's very probable that in given circumstances and considering local winter weather conditions dead person without any noticeable signs of injuries or foul play yet lacking clothing ended up like that due to hypothermia caused by getting lost... then why not rely on odds with other details as well?
<modsnip: referenced post was snipped>
On top of that it sounds like Jack had no reason to be near Granger but very good reason to travel via interstate that's just next to it.
He wasn't found in the middle of nowhere, he was found very near that pipeline. Red tape suggests basically right next to it. If he got lost and was walking along the pipeline, hoping to reach a main road or a city, then shouldn't his clothing end up somewhere along it? That should catch the eye of multiple cops driving there. Not one piece of clothing did? Possibly after winter they werent really visible anymore, but...
I don't know. For me more details points at foul play here than at unfortunate accident. The latter is still reasonable scenario.
But is it unreasonable to consider something along the: he was going to visit his family... got tired or hungry or in need to buy a gas, stopped somewhere... caught an eye of people willing to rob him, or accidentally got into some trouble... and endend up driven to the middle of the desert and left there?
I can't tell. Cause there are places where it's a real thing to beat up a guy, drove him far from the road and kick out of the car, sometimes even strip naked. If that's not something that ever happened near Granger in '70s and '80s then okay, some "getting lost" scenario is way more likely than that. But if it did...