I believe SG was born in Aus, but moved back (her dad was working here) to USA not long after.video is down the page .. I thought she was from Australia for some reason as well but she is from south of Cincinnati
I believe SG was born in Aus, but moved back (her dad was working here) to USA not long after.video is down the page .. I thought she was from Australia for some reason as well but she is from south of Cincinnati
Basically the jacket, holster and backpack was all Walmart. I wonder if FBI have asked all the Walmarts within a 100 mile radius to check for a transaction that included all 3. Walmart has nearly the same amount of cameras as a casino! They’ve helped in many cases. I’m sad I even have to ask if they’ve done this, but the whole investigation is a clown show. So many resources poured into a follow up lead 2x and NOTHING to show for it.
Someone who had done work in her home may have innocently bragged to friends or extended family that it was a rich house and she was the mother of SG. And didn't realize that they had planted a seed in this person's mind to hatch a plan.She was put on the radar by someone who had been to that house, or someone in her orbit who may have unwittingly revealed information to some nefarious people. If I'm wrong, I'll eat my words, but my instinct says there's a common denominator in there somewhere, LE just hasn't sussed it out yet.
I’m sure she thinks she’s helping but this was not commissioned or issued by officials and the public is going to see this sketch and run with it. They could easily overlook a good suspect because he (or she) doesn’t look like this sketch. It rubs me the wrong way.4
Sketch artist Lois Gibson released a sketch of what she thinks Nancy Guthrie’s kidnapper might look like
“I GUESSED at the parts of face covered with ski mask on this Nancy Guthrie kidnapping suspect. I used the surveillance photos shown,” Gibson warned after revealing her sketch to social med
![]()
Nancy Guthrie kidnapper’s possible looks revealed by forensic artist after reviewing surveillance footage
The famous sketch artist is offering the first glimpse of what the masked creep might look like.nypost.com
I think it's reasonable to presume a few traits based off family and friends' comments but we don't know any of these people.I have seen quite a few posts through this thread commenting on Nancy’s personality - she was sharp as a tack, she is a feisty lady, nobody’s fool type comments and what a wonderful, lovely person she is. We don’t actually know what she is like as a person, I just find it a bit odd a whole personality is being made up.
My goodness, it appears all roads lead to W-mart!
Amateur opinion and speculation
Same. He probably looks nothing like him.I’m sure she thinks she’s helping but this was not commissioned or issued by officials and the public is going to see this sketch and run with it. They could easily overlook a good suspect because he (or she) doesn’t look like this sketch. It rubs me the wrong way.
The article states that .. not me lol. She never collected her own mail either, she had to have help. It points out that her mobility was indeed quite limited. I have had 5 femur surgeries and I can still walked to the mailbox. I just wonder exactly what limited her mobility to the point she could barely walk. Osteoporosis I have but it's treated with infusions, back issues I know are mobility limiting issues.I don’t think you can assume she is tough because her husband died 40 years ago and she collects her own mail.
Yes to be clear I was responding to the article itself and not the veracity.To follow up, I appreciate your extension of what is in the Radar Online article and your analysis of what it means, if true. I was pointing out the article doesn't provide confirmation. I see now that you did say that in an addition. Thanks for explaining tech aspects of cloud storage and how that is relevant here.
Walmart always get them!They check way past a 100 mile radius. They check entire database systems. They specifically have superior access to data.
The article quoting an insider states they were strategically able to smash the cameras before the motion detected them and streamed or saved etc. and so if they’re smashed now no one can check remotely - if true.One would think. But that's also an assumption. After a while you stop checking in, you start ignoring push alerts. The subscription wasn't on the external cams. Why wasn't that paid, probably a lapse or oversight.
We don't know. At this point I am most interested in the inside of the crime scene, the situation with any alarm or other interior security, the supposed signs of forced entry that we are not clear about, and all that.
In the CNN interview with Sheriff Nanos, he states that there were multiple cameras in Nancy's house and data/video is trying to be retrieved from them.
Sheriff in Guthrie case: ‘we have DNA,’ ‘don’t know whose it is’ | CNN
Your posted link didn't work but I think separating the text like I've done here will make it functional.
I have a pool and live in a warmer climate in CA. I think the pool was ruled out and they allowed the cleaners to do their job with LE supervision. Pools are a pain to take care of and can quickly get filled with algae from debris. Maintaining chemicals is important and it’s costly if they aren’t maintained properly and consistently. I don’t think it’s a big deal for the pool cleaners to do the outside job they were contracted to do. JMO.I don't have a pool. Could the pool cleaner vacuumed the bottom of the pool for evidence?
JMO as I don't know.
Opinion of "sources close to the case believe." It's clickbait, IMO, from RadarOnline republished by AOL. The headline and opening sentence call in a theory. It doesn't provide context for insiders' relationship to the victims or investigation, so it's difficult to weigh the opinions.source or opinion?
Same here. This is just an opinion, so far*, but I there are potentially good reasons to believe that the detailed searches were useful. I was disappointed and surprised by the early news today, talking only about people being released without arrest. Later wording was more nuanced, though.I don’t believe there is nothing to show for last nights raids yet.
Have not heard a peep official or otherwise that robbery was also involved. I agree. It’s perplexing and the ransoms did not make sense.I don’t know. Your theory’s motive is money? That supposed ransom came much later and it didn’t make sense. Ransoms are delivered immediately to the family. They tell them not to contact authorities or they’ll hurt their loved one. Who sends a ransom to the media immediately alerting authorities? On top of that, who writes that you’ll never hear from them, the perp or perps, again?
If this was a gang initiation, you don’t take a body with you.
Did they ever confirm that nothing was stolen from the house? Have they ruled out robbery?
Sure but they'll capture him approaching the cameras and smashing them and send a person detected motion to their phones before he can disable them (JUST like it did with the Nest cam outside at the front door).The article quoting an insider states they were strategically able to smash the cameras before the motion detected them and streamed or saved etc. and so if they’re smashed now no one can check remotely - if true.
there has to be a second camera somewhere for it to have detected the motion that the Sheriff referenced after the front door camera was removed,Your posted link didn't work but I think separating the text like I've done here will make it functional.
I saw the Sheriff nod when Ed Lavandera asked about "other cameras in the house" but my sense of the phrasing of the question and the Sheriff's intentionally vague response is that we don't know for sure if the additional cameras are IN the house or AT the house (meaning they could be additional exterior cameras). It was clear to me that there are more cameras than the front door one, and that Google is trying to extract video from the other(s). But specifically whether they were indoors or in the back yard or back door or what, wasn't definitively made clear as I interpret it. MOO