- Joined
- Oct 14, 2010
- Messages
- 3,132
- Reaction score
- 37,242
Buy WHY has it never been spoken about either way I wonder? It really bugs me that it hasn't. I dunno why.Maybe she took the cane with her when she was taken?
Buy WHY has it never been spoken about either way I wonder? It really bugs me that it hasn't. I dunno why.Maybe she took the cane with her when she was taken?
I agree. We can't tell from the timeline provided that NG ever made it back home.
But, I can't piece together the blood on the front stoop with the Uber ride.
jmopinion
Of course. It is as most likely intentionally crafted by the fbi.I put the transcript of the latest SG video in to ChatGPT to get an analysis of it from the viewpoint of an investigator and here is what it said, very interesting:
"Every line feels carefully chosen.
The opening — “We received your message, and we understand” — stands out immediately. Saying “we understand” goes beyond acknowledging contact. It suggests they’re not judging, not challenging, not escalating. It’s a de-escalation move. In hostage or ransom situations, that kind of language is often used to keep the other person calm and engaged, not defensive.
The next part — “We beg you now to return our mother to us so we can celebrate with her” — is interesting for what it avoids. They don’t use words like “victim,” “crime,” or “wrong.” They don’t say “alive” or “safe,” which could backfire if the situation is worse than hoped. Instead, they frame it around family and a positive future moment. It subtly assumes she’s alive without forcing the issue.
“This is the only way we will have peace” is also notable. It doesn’t threaten consequences or mention law enforcement. It frames compliance as emotional closure rather than risk, which may lower the perpetrator’s fear of what happens next.
Finally, “This is very valuable to us and we will pay.” That sentence is doing a lot of work. It clearly signals compliance without turning their mother into a price tag or negotiating publicly. No timelines, no demands — just reassurance.
What really stands out overall is what isn’t there: no anger, no moralizing, no pressure, no ultimatums. That restraint feels intentional. The message reads less like a raw emotional plea and more like something designed to stabilize a volatile situation and keep the person on the other end from panicking or escalating.
Whether or not law enforcement helped shape it, this doesn’t feel spontaneous. It feels strategic — focused on keeping communication open and the situation from getting worse."
I may have missed something but it just seems out of place to me if it was old. The house seems to be kept to a high standard and from what has been said there were workers often there. Wouldn't it have been noticed earlier if it was old? But again I may have missed something here. JmoBut nothing indicates it was recent blood. Could have been old and there were no footprints in it either
Good post. This plant wasn’t removed three months ago, as there is vegetation on the ground.I just noticed something... The front door where the blood is, I was browsing street view through different dates, and the 'plant' scattered around the door previous years had that exact plant in the pot that is now empty.
View attachment 642630
View attachment 642629
This makes me wonder if they pulled up the plant? Key? Evidence? Blood? the image I grabbed was from Nov 2025. May be nothing.. just saw this., tried my best to enhance it... best I could do. But she had that same plant in similar pots in the front.
You don't believe the pacemaker communicating with the iphone/watch is evidence she made it back home?I agree. We can't tell from the timeline provided that NG ever made it back home.
But, I can't piece together the blood on the front stoop with the Uber ride.
jmopinion
I'm 100% confident blood experts can tell if the blood was fresh, old, or somewhere in between.I may have missed something but it just seems out of place to me if it was old. The house seems to be kept to a high standard and from what has been said there were workers often there. Wouldn't it have been noticed earlier if it was old? But again I may have missed something here. Jmo
Maybe she doesn't always use it? Are you talking about a photo with SG and her where she has it?Buy WHY has it never been spoken about either way I wonder? It really bugs me that it hasn't. I dunno why.
I'm not convinced. I can't figure a motive where he'd remove the body. Why not just wait for her to pass if you're looking for $. It'd take years for her to be declared dead. And if he's the ransomer, how's he gonna explain his cash infusion?At this point is anyone not convinced it’s the BIL? The only lingering question to me is how much Annie actually knew or was involved.
Are you able to name any such freelance journalist just say as an exampleRegarding the door key: there are key boxes that can be opened with a code, now. We used to leave a key in a fake rock in the shrubbery near the door. Now we have a key box.
I don’t think it’s routine, either.
Since we are bound by the rule to stick to MSM sources, I will just say: there are former MSM journalists who are freelance and are doing the legwork and research that the MSM won’t do. They are requesting documents normally available to the press and piblic but finding them sealed.
There are many aspects to this case that are… unusual.
You opened my eyes.I’ll be blunt this morning. In my opinion, NG demise originated from AG’s home. The what and the how, I don’t know. Investigators returning to her home again last night documenting, mapping, and collecting evidence was the final event that moved me in that direction. IMO
Yeah, you are correct im sure. I was more thinking of the previous times they were there filming and updating if they noticed anything that made them pause.There is no way they entered AG's house last night without a warrant, imo.
jmo
I don't know. I'm baffled by the timeline, but it is possible the phone and the body were together until they weren't. Someone can carry a phone back to the house in the middle of the night and place it somewhere distinctive that the ransom-note writer knew about.You don't believe the pacemaker communicating with the iphone/watch is evidence she made it back home?
I suppose that situation could be manipulated but find that unlikely as it would most likely involve extra steps in the process.
I'm definitely not convinced. I don't think they had anything to do with it. It's too far fetched imo.At this point is anyone not convinced it’s the BIL? The only lingering question to me is how much Annie actually knew or was involved.
DBM - Completely lost my mind.
As Brian says... it's strange for 3 deputies to be at TC & AG's house, 7 days along, late at night for approx 3 hours taking photos in various locations throughout the house and garage.
...this has to be leading in a certain direction, surely ??
Oh and Brian - get some SLEEP![]()
![]()
snippedAnd if he's the ransomer, how's he gonna explain his cash infusion?
Of course but has anything been said about this? And again I just can't work out if it was old how that would look in terms of the whole situation. Nancy got an Uber that night so she was definitely alive then. Maybe I'm just missing the point, I apologise. Jmo.I'm 100% confident blood experts can tell if the blood was fresh, old, or somewhere in between.
^^^THIS^^^I'm not convinced. I can't figure a motive where he'd remove the body. Why not just wait for her to pass if you're looking for $. It'd take years for her to be declared dead. And if he's the ransomer, how's he gonna explain his cash infusion?
Statistics say that someone close, like a family member is most likely involved. Why do you think it’s far fetched?I'm definitely not convinced. I don't think they had anything to do with it. It's too far fetched imo.
As awful as this sounds, I don't think NG is alive. The two scenarios are both extremely grim. If she has been kidnapped without her medication, it has now been nearly one week. She is frail, vulnerable, and with medical conditions requiring medication. In the other scenario where something may or may not have happened at AG's house or inside NG's house by someone she knew, there is no way she is alive and those who did it concealed the body.ITA, I find it unusual the FBI would go in 'camera's ablazing' knowing that the media was camped out in front of the home. I believe it is possible to have been a staged event to throw off someone(s). I remember seeing this happen in one other case - The Kelsey Berreth/Patrick Frazee case and they were much, much more discreet.
If this was an actual CS investigation at AC's home, does anyone know if they all returned to AC's there after dinner? If they did and hung out a bit, maybe something did happen there (an unplanned argument or disagreement) and Nancy was driven home. Garage door opens close to 11 pm.
<Crazyland Scenario Speculation>
Nancy wouldn't have to have been alive at the time she was dropped off, she could have just been placed in the home and then someone(s) returned and staged the scene and dreamed up this crazy kidnapping for ransom scenario. Garage door wouldn't show opening again if someone had keys and entered and exited the front door.
I find it hard to believe it was any family member.. This case makes my head hurt.
Still holding out hope that Nancy is found alive and reunited with her loved ones.
JMO