loves2readhistory
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 10, 2026
- Messages
- 99
- Reaction score
- 734
Read again and you can see ==Where did you get the note quotes from ?
The poster gave examples of POSSIBLE RANSOM NOTE
Read again and you can see ==Where did you get the note quotes from ?
The sheriff recently clarified that no glove was found at the residence.The pair found in the field - is it one of those that has the DNA on it? Or is it a glove found at her home that has DNA on it?
This is good to hear!!!
Criminals are mostly stupid IMO, lucky for LE as they more often than not convict themselves with there stupidityIt's difficult to imagine the suspect being so careless. You'd think they'd burn them. I'm afraid this may prove to be another deadend.
Sexual predatorThose closest to NG will hopefully have been extensively questioned about her routines and schedule. Neighbours also, people at her Church and those who zoomed in to SG's church.
Without having that picture, we wise Web Sleuths are missing so much. There was a lot of chat initially about what an 84 year old can do and what they may struggle with. It was often very generic and quite demeaning in some instances. In terms of NG, none of us know exactly how her medical and mobility issues affected her. With my own nearly 80 year old mother who lives alone - I know exactly her limitations and strengths. I do know that this generation is often quite "tough" and enjoy their independence. My Mum, like NG, has lived in her house for a very long time. It's now too big for her, but she won't move and I won't push her on this.
Motives seem to boil down IMO to:
1. To hurt SG or another member of the family (a grudge, a debt?)
2. Money - either from NG directly or in the form of a ransom
3. Robbery - gone wrong - so the aim was to break in and steal.
4. Mental illness and a fascination with either SG or NG therefore a distorted motive.
5. Their moment of fame - knowing that this would be big news given the SG connection.
6. A wider gang related crime, whose motive was to send a message to someone or something?
Good to know, thanks muchYes, but usually only partial prints due to the pulling/tugging to get them off. You would have a better chance of extracting dna than obtaining usable prints, but it has been done. Unfortunately in this case it looks like the gloves were double layered. Unless the outer, found glove was tried on for fit, forensics may not be able to extract dna or prints from the outer glove.
Because journalists aren't supposed to insert themselves into the story. Journalists report the story. Harvey Levin is also a lawyer. I am confident TMZ has a lot of house counsel or lawyers on retainers. Paying the ransom was not their job. Ransom writer wants money and attention from SG. She sure is paying attention to PERP NOW! imo. I am confident TMZ was sent ransom notes, imo because they are an entertainment outlet. Probably another source obsessed perp uses to stalk SG.There is something I don't understand. The way TMZ inserted themself, I don't understand why they don't pay the ransom themself. It's a small payment compared to what they gain. With the information they can go to the authorities en cash in the reward + they will have the biggest scoop they can dream of. So why don't they? I think they don't trust the writer of the notes or they knew all along it was fake messages. They said the location of the applewatch was 'accurate', how do they know? Noone else said it was accurate.
They really have had a lot on this case. More than they do when British people go missing here tbh
I think if Nancy is deceased, it would make sense that her body has been buried in the desert. This keeps the body "safe" from animals or weather conditions etc.Agreed, body is in the desert, a ravine, off a country road, not in a neighborhood. Hidden in brush, not buried. Sorry, I hope I’m wrong… JMO
JMO
Does anyone know if the RR was perhaps a rental car?To REALLY do a forensic search on a vehicle suspected of transporting a “bleeding” crime victim—remember Nancy’s blood traces on front walk, they would need to basically disassemble that car looking for evidence. They can’t do that in a Culver’s parking lot.
IMO—I think they treated w/Luminol and got hits that gave credibility to that car being used to transport Nancy.
A relatively new car (which I think this one is) wouldn’t have all the opportunity to acquire blood traces like a car that had been used over time and could have all kinds of trace evidence in it. Think soccer mom’s car in family with two dogs, a baby, and various kids going to various places. Or a Range Rover used by a veterinarian to make ranch calls. Or a vehicle used by deer hunter or fisherman—those types of vehicles could legitimately have traces of blood inside that were not from a crime victim.
So they are going on odds of possibility/Occam’s Razor thinking maybe in why they took the Range Rover in and let the Rio Rico car go home.
It feels weak. Why would someone go out of their way to completely disguise themselves and then not incinerate or very carefully discard everything? Seems casual to toss a glove.The sheriff recently clarified that no glove was found at the residence.
This particular glove is said to have been found 2 miles from the residence, has a strangers DNA and looks similar to evil masked man's gloves.
I've been thinking about this a lot as I've been stuck on the question of why they didn't leave any kind of note whether ransom or otherwise at the scene.One thing I’ve learned from my years of following true crime is it’s a huge mistake to believe LE immediately shares with the public everything found at the crime scene. They only tell us what they think we should know, reason is mainly to get leads from the public.
Maybe part of the reason might be psychological, to cause the criminal to puzzle over if the note or message was found? But I’d say almost always there’s holdback evidence, for one reason I suppose is to separate true confessions from false confessions.
JMO
It doesn’t make any sense why they would do this at all, ugh.From article, "Investigators collected approximately 16 gloves in various areas near the house, the spokesperson said, noting that most of them were searchers’ gloves that they discarded in various areas when they searched the vicinity."
i hope those involved were reprimanded for littering their gloves like trash and wasting time on unnecessary testing.
A lot of this case, especially in the beginning, seemed like a waste of time, unfortunately. Thank goodness the FBI has taking over.
I don’t know about you, but if I were the suspect, I’d want to incinerate everything to be 100% evidence was destroyed. But I wouldn’t want to do it in an urban or suburban area - too many prying eyes and noses. Plenty of criminals have been caught burning evidence within nose-shot of neighbors. I’d go to a remote area and torch it.Lantana guy's gloves looked distinctive. If that's true, there could be a chance they have the DNA of Lantana guy. And, then it seems reasonable to think that Lantana guy's might be in CODIS.
Seems strange for a criminal to discard their gloves within 2 miles of the crime, knowing there's a chance your DNA is on them. Cutting them up and flushing them down a toilet, throwing them in with garbage at a dumpster or disposing of them in a way where it's highly unlikely the gloves would be found would make more sense.
JMO
It's difficult to imagine the suspect being so careless. You'd think they'd burn them. I'm afraid this may prove to be another deadend.
I read again. Poster did not state these are examples. The poster stated that the perp is obsessed with S , and proceeded to quote in quotation marks, which is how facts are referenced.Read again and you can see ==
The poster gave examples of POSSIBLE RANSOM NOTE
Helpful and interesting.Interesting tidbit while we all ponder where Nancy Guthrie may be. We all hope she will be found alive, but in the event she has passed where would her body be?
AI response to the question, “Where do murderers like to hide bodies?”.
Based on forensic research and historical criminal cases, murderers often select dump sites that balance isolation (to avoid detection) with accessibility
. These sites are often familiar to the offender, such as areas near their home, workplace, or along familiar travel routes.
Common dump sites used by murderers include:
Key Factors in Site Selection
- Remote or Wooded Areas: Heavily thicketed or forested areas that are accessible by car but out of public view are frequently used. Examples include Baltimore’s Leakin Park.
- Waterways and Swamps: Deep, murky, or remote bodies of water are commonly used, such as the Louisiana Swamps or various bayous.
- Roadsides and Deserts: Remote stretches of highways, particularly in high desert regions, are frequently used to dump bodies. The I-40 corridor in the US has been identified as a significant site for highway serial killings.
- Alleys and Urban Debris: In urban areas, victims are often discarded in alleys or behind buildings, sometimes covered by existing trash.
- Industrial Sites and Landfills: Abandoned industrial areas, construction debris sites, or landfill areas are used to conceal bodies.
- Properties Linked to the Offender: Studies indicate that in cases with preplanning, offenders are more likely to dispose of bodies on their own property, such as under homes, in crawl spaces, or in basements.
Research into serial murder suggests that offenders tend to use "killing fields"—specific, recurring areas—that allow them to return to the victims to relive their crimes. Many of these sites are chosen because they are on the fringes of urban areas, often referred to as "the boondocks," where bodies can remain hidden for long periods.
Agreed. I said previously that I'm not impressed with the job that either local LE or FBI is doing, however I think it is going to come down to who makes the biggest or the most mistakes as to this being solved...jmoWell there was this phd criminology student that left a knife sheath with his dna at a crime scene once…
It could have been dropped accidentally, rather than intentionally dumped. It's dark in the desert at night. He might not have noticed it had fallen.Fox reporting that the glove found looks similar to the nitrile glove worn by the suspect . And they have sent the glove for analysis.
I don’t think the glove would have been dumped in an exposed area. Just my opinion.
I think we are all speed readers here, with excellent retention, overall. Even if we miss some posts, the topics recirculate, another chance to understand evidence, or see a different take on the same evidence. The case starts to come together over time.I think you can use this thread as an example of what you are implying
So far it has 1512 pages multiply that by 20 posts per page and even if one has read every post and one had felt 500 posts were intriguing and 1000 posts were saying similar. How many posts can you recall with accuracyespecially ones that are not recent
Whereas AI can do all that categorisation in seconds therefore churning out the most valid posts / tips but you would still need a human to see if those posts were phrased as " imo " 'hypothetically phrased " or leads
Just my musings
and two criminals who attached a phone to GPS and drove all the way to crime scene to murder Teresa Seivers, those two were very high on the dumbometerWell there was this phd criminology student that left a knife sheath that had his dna at a crime scene once…
True, but one might argue par for the course with the blood trail out the front door, Lantanagate and his image on camera all being other examples of sloppiness, carelessness. Guess we will find our something soon one-way or another.It's difficult to imagine the suspect being so careless. You'd think they'd burn them. I'm afraid this may prove to be another deadend.