www.tmz.com
If the glove came from a person involved in the removal of NG I imagine her DNA would be on it. The FBI statement read by BE only mentions "a" profile and that that profile is male. IMO
I think the theft aspect makes it something more than just petty vandalism. Under Arizona Revised Statute 13-1602, vandalism is defined as recklessly damaging, defacing, or tampering with another person's property, with theft (if it occurs,) coming as an additional charge on top of the vandalism charge.
Yes but it would also confirm path they took from NGs home. That would be significant. Right now they seem to be grasping at straws because looking at a map of the area there are numerous ingress and egress routes throughout the community.
I've been thinking about the gloves. The gloves shown in the video are so thick, ie., multiple layers of gloves IMO, that it would be IMO impossible to remove a glove without using your teeth to help peel it off. Your other hand would be layered also, so could not be used to remove the other glove. Here's to hoping that the driver of the vehicle took off his outer layer of glove by using his teeth, then threw it out of the window. DNA
Another misleading headline!!! So much of this garbage in this case.Glove Matches Suspect's Pair in Nancy Guthrie Video, FBI Says, DNA Sent for Testing
The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's case just took a major forensic turn ... TMZ has confirmed.
Is it me or is that the most misleading headline ever? The glove matches the type that the suspect was wearing, NOT the DNA.Glove Matches Suspect's Pair in Nancy Guthrie Video, FBI Says, DNA Sent for Testing
The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's case just took a major forensic turn ... TMZ has confirmed.
This is the most obtuse click-bait headline.Glove Matches Suspect's Pair in Nancy Guthrie Video, FBI Says, DNA Sent for Testing
The investigation into Nancy Guthrie's case just took a major forensic turn ... TMZ has confirmed.
They’ll hope to find NG’s DNA, too, to know if this is a real lead.
Good thinking!
That's why it's important to read below the headline, always. MOO
In my opinion the recent investigative paths are unlikely to yield success, but they're going public in the hope it forces a mistake.
They may simply want to give the impression that they’re making progress, bc it’s not really clear they’ve made any…
I would more so guess that they’re looking for a body, not a pacemaker that’s been removed. Unfortunately, and this is morbid too but the reality, very little may remain if she was deceased and left out in the desert. If she’s no longer alive, I doubt someone kept her in their home. Chances are they went out into the desert given the location. It’s like perps who live near a wooded area. They’re always searched. These areas are vast. It’s so hard to find someone and murderers know it. This is another reason I find it hard to believe this was the first murder the person committed if it wasn’t personal (someone close to Nancy who spent months planning it out). The perp may be connected to other (unsolved) crimes. I’m sure they’re looking at similar crimes in the area or close to it. As AB just said, who has a balaclava in Arizona? Maybe a skier who travels but generally speaking, this was someone who purchased specific items to commit this particular crime and/or others. It’s not something someone has in their closet who lives in Arizona. It’s hot. It points to a career criminal or a crime which is personal in nature. It’s not impossible that the person travels and has winter clothes but there’s a good chance they purchased items to commit this type of crime.
