- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 33,209
- Reaction score
- 217,708
Fair point, but one thing that stood out to me was how the presser opened by describing Gus as shy, adventurous, but someone who has never left the property any considerable distance. Then straight after that they stuck to the line that he has wandered off.
To me those two statements do not sit comfortably together. If even his family say he has never strayed far, it feels odd to keep presenting “wandered off” as the only explanation.
That is because everything they have points to Gus having wandered off. We don't know "everything they have".
Most small children don't wander off, until they do. We hear that again and again in cases of young children going missing ... whether they are later found or not.
imo