Australia, Zoologist Adam Britton pleads guilty to Supreme Court charges including bestiality, torture of Dogs

  • #101
  • #102
I can’t bear to think about all the dogs he tortured. How could anyone do that to such innocent, loving animals? His evil is beyond comprehension, and he should be jailed for life.

At least the 2 Swiss Shepherds are with her parents now.
What about all the ones he murdered after torture?

Besides pure sadism, and I don’t know why we should treat him better than any human rapist, what human can get sexually excited by a dog???
 
  • #103
  • #104
Warning!
Graphic content!



"The reports,
tendered to the court ahead of his sentencing,
were written by forensic psychologists between January and July,
based on hours of conversations with Britton."
 
Last edited:
  • #105
It's kind of like he tried to blame anyone else except himself, for them to share in the blame, from reading the article.
Thanks @Dotta.

I'll have to read the rest another time. It is graphic and disgusting.
 
  • #106
OMG!
He's saying a fight with his ex wife is what started it all, and that the relationship is what caused him to do what he did. :mad:
 
  • #107
Let's face it.
He is raving mad.

I have no further comments concerning this individual.

JMO
 
  • #108
Warning!
Graphic content!



"The reports,
tendered to the court ahead of his sentencing,
were written by forensic psychologists between January and July,
based on hours of conversations with Britton."
What a nightmare and mess. If he hated humans and wanted to be an animal, why couldn’t he have just been one of those people romantically and sexually attracted to animals [Zoophillia]?

As bad as that is, I might be able to forgive that as some sickness he couldn’t control: It’s the cruelty, the torture, the violence and murder of dogs and other animals which is wholly unforgivable.
 
  • #109
I’m also shocked that Daily Mail was able to obtain his private information contained in the psychological assessment reports. Do they not have HIPPA laws in Australia?
 
  • #110
I'm still at a loss for words over that recent article.
He even blamed his dogs. :mad:

He said they made the first move sexually towards him.
 
  • #111
I'm still at a loss for words over that recent article.
He even blamed his dogs. :mad:

He said they made the first move sexually towards him.
very much like a pedo blaming his minor victim, they "flirted" with me first.
 
  • #112
I'm still at a loss for words over that recent article.
He even blamed his dogs. :mad:

He said they made the first move sexually towards him.
Well, some dogs may occasionally rub against a human leg. But they are animals. Also, i would not expect both to do it. And if they did it in a pair, this indicates that AB probably already taught them to behave so. Dogs would behave in a way to please their master.
 
  • #113
I’m also shocked that Daily Mail was able to obtain his private information contained in the psychological assessment reports. Do they not have HIPPA laws in Australia?
we have our Privacy Act, but to some degree it goes out the window if you commit crimes and that medical info is relevant to the crime


According to the Medical Indemnity Protection Society (MIPS), patient data can be released to the relevant parties if:


  • The patient is at serious risk, or they pose a risk to another person
  • It forms part of approved research
  • It’s in the best interests of society
  • The law requires it



A complex situation arises if a patient admits to a serious crime during a confidential meeting with their doctor.For example, should a patient reveal that they have seriously assaulted a person but are yet to inform the police,or has no intention of doing so, their doctor has every right to take that information to the authorities.


The MIPS clarifies this further by stating that it is an offence to knowingly conceal a serious indictable crime, even if bound by the Privacy Act. This is typically the only real reason that such a situation might take place.
 
  • #114
we have our Privacy Act, but to some degree it goes out the window if you commit crimes and that medical info is relevant to the crime


According to the Medical Indemnity Protection Society (MIPS), patient data can be released to the relevant parties if:


  • The patient is at serious risk, or they pose a risk to another person
  • It forms part of approved research
  • It’s in the best interests of society
  • The law requires it



A complex situation arises if a patient admits to a serious crime during a confidential meeting with their doctor.For example, should a patient reveal that they have seriously assaulted a person but are yet to inform the police,or has no intention of doing so, their doctor has every right to take that information to the authorities.


The MIPS clarifies this further by stating that it is an offence to knowingly conceal a serious indictable crime, even if bound by the Privacy Act. This is typically the only real reason that such a situation might take place.
Thanks for this information!
 
  • #115
  • #116
If it was up to me I would have the place demolished.

Who knows what creeps might want to make a shrine of it.
 
  • #117
If it was up to me I would have the place demolished.

Who knows what creeps might want to make a shrine of it.

Yep.
I don't understand why it is still standing? 😵‍💫

Who would buy it?

Better to demolish it and sell the land.

JMO
 
  • #118
I suppose it's up to whoever owns it.
I don't know if he owns it, or someone else.

If it's someone else that's bought it., and they're not that rich, if they demolish it they might be left with only the amount they could get for the block of land. They could end up homeless and unable to afford another house.

Plus they might not even know what happened there.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
56
Guests online
3,342
Total visitors
3,398

Forum statistics

Threads
632,598
Messages
18,628,860
Members
243,210
Latest member
griffinsteven661
Back
Top