GUILTY CA - Sherri Papini, 34, Redding, fake abduction Nov 2016, ARREST MAR 2022 #27

  • #141
So we can infer from this that the bottom line is that she hasn't convinced the judge to give her custody of the kids. I just hope it doesn't affect the divorce going through...

The divorce was final on June 6, 2023.

The records show Keith filed for divorce on 4/20/22, and that Sherri & her attorney fought vigorously, contesting Keith's every move. Per Shasta County Court case record, the divorce granted on May 31, 2023, the divorce became final, and the judgement was officially entered on June 6.

KP has had custody for 9 years, and the case before the court now is child custody trial. SP is currently seeking reunification with one of her children (son) and increased visitation rights with another (daughter).

ETA:

  • 05/31/2023 Judgment - Status Only
    Judicial Officer
    Ryan, Summer D
  • 06/06/2023 Notice of Entry of Judgment

 
Last edited:
  • #142
Wednesday, August 13th:
*Trial [Long Cause] Hearing (Divorce) (Day 2) (@ 8:30am PT) – CA – Sherri Louise Papini (39/now 45) vs. Keith Papini (38/now 42) Divorce case filed April, 2022. Shasta County
Keith has already won a series of legal battles in the divorce – including having his ex-wife declared an ‘unfit parent’ & gaining sole legal & physical custody of T & V. Papini is allowed only supervised visits with the children which take place at a court building in Redding & voice & video calls at Keith’s discretion.
On March 3, 2022, Sherri Papini was arrested by the FBI, accused of lying to federal agents & faking her kidnapping to spend time with her ex-boyfriend, away from her husband & family. Six weeks after her arrest, Papini signed a plea deal admitting that she had orchestrated the hoax. In September, 2022, she was sentenced to 18 months in prison & fined $300,000. Papini was released from prison in August, 2023 & placed in a halfway house. In April, 2022, a few days after Sherri pleaded guilty to fraud charges, Keith filed for divorce from his wife & for sole custody of their children.
Trial began on 8/12/25 (thru 8/14/25).
Judge Kathryn J. Barton presiding. Keith’s defense attorney Conard Manuel of Manuel & Tescher retained. Sherri’s defense attorneys Kinney & Kinney.

Case info from 4/20/22 thru 6/4/25 reference post #106 here:
https://websleuths.com/threads/ca-s...ion-nov-2016-arrest-mar-2022-27.744282/page-6

8/12/25 Tuesday, Trial Day 1: No info available yet. Trial continues on Wednesday, 8/13/25.

FYI, since June 6, 2023, the Divorce was final and Judgement entered. All matters under this case number since June 2023 are regarding Parent Cust and Support.
 
  • #143
FYI, since June 6, 2023, the Divorce was final and Judgement entered. All matters under this case number since June 2023 are regarding Parent Cust and Support.

Thanks - I changed my "Divorce" to "Child Custody".
 
  • #144

Real-Life ‘Gone Girl’ Sherri Papini Says She Was Canceled Because Her ‘Story Is Very Relatable’​



7/9/25

[..]

Her therapist, licensed clinical psychologist Stephen Diggs, who specializes in personality disorders — the result of early childhood trauma, he says — offers a possible explanation for that. “Lying was one of her defense mechanisms,” he tells Us. Papini “got rid of… telling outright lies pretty quickly” in treatment, he says, but she would still “evade telling people the truth and get into some conflict because she’d evaded something.”

[..]

Her Life Today
Papini’s focus now, she says, is making restitution and getting her kids back. She was not paid for the doc, and she self-published the book, so if she makes a profit on that, it won’t be for some time. (It should go without saying but I’ll say it anyway: Papini was not compensated for this interview.) She works various gigs for money: freelance writing assignments, geriatric caregiving for family members… When she applies for more traditional work, “they find out who I am, and then they conclude the interview,” she says, “so it is incredibly difficult for me to find a job.”

She makes an interesting point about that: “The restitution is all on me. And James Reyes participated.” That’s true regardless of how you think Reyes and Papini ended up in that house together. He knew she was there for three weeks while authorities were searching for her, and he didn’t come forward. At a minimum, Papini thinks he should have been charged with conspiracy. (That statute of limitations has now run out.)

[..]

She has recently been back in court for two cases not related to her child-custody agreement. In January, Shawn Hibdon, a man she dated after she got out of prison, sought to evict her from a Shingletown, California, home owned by 33 TEN Properties LLC, of which Hibdon is a managing member and agent. She was in court in June to fight the eviction but tells Us at the time of our speaking that the two are coming to a settlement. In fact, she says, she’s talking to me from that home. Elizabeth Elizondo, attorney for Hibdon, tells Us that Papini is illegally occupying the property and that the case is ongoing.

[..]
Dear Mr. Hibdon, we tried to warn you but you didn’t listen. That cute little parking lot photo that was splashed all over the internet - we all laughed. We knew what was coming your way. Tough lesson to learn, good luck getting her out of your house.
 
  • #145
Dear Mr. Hibdon, we tried to warn you but you didn’t listen. That cute little parking lot photo that was splashed all over the internet - we all laughed. We knew what was coming your way. Tough lesson to learn, good luck getting her out of your house.

While she was at court, did he change the locks?
 
  • #146
  • #147

5/24/25

When questioned by FBI agents, Reyes claimed that Papini planned “everything,” including the decision to use a wood-burning tool to brand her shoulder. He passed a polygraph test.

Keith’s lawyer told the docuseries that any allegations of “severe abuse, manipulation and lying” are false and “disproven by a mountain of documentary evidence and objective, indisputable facts.”

In the docuseries, Papini claimed that the descriptions she gave of the two masked Hispanic women were supposed to represent Reyes’ mother. She hoped investigators would use it to track down Reyes without her saying he abducted her. But Rittenmeyer told Papini that Reyes’ mother was Irish.

“OK. I’ve met her twice,” Papini responded. “It had very little to do with his mother and her ethnicity. It was about trying to get them to alert them to his identity without saying his name out loud. Quite frankly, I don’t give a f—k whether she’s Hispanic or not. It was about James. It wasn’t about her.”

Rittenmeyer said that the docuseries will detail “a specific personality disorder that she has.”

“I went into this understanding that the conventional wisdom about Sherri is that she’s a sociopath, a narcissist who faked a hoax kidnapping to get attention,” said Rittenmeyer.

“[But]… there are certain ways that Sherri’s personality manifests that are very theatrical and can feel performative. And so, given what we understand about her, I think it’s basic human nature to be incredibly skeptical. I did not trust anything she said to me. If she told me my mother loved me, I was going to get a second and third source because, even as her lawyer says, she’s a convicted liar.”
 
  • #148
I hope SP got hit last week with both a cease and desist Order to keep JR's name out of her mouth-- and a new charge of perjury! And she thought this little performance was going to win her custody and/or increased visitation with her children. :rolleyes:
 
  • #149

5/24/25

When questioned by FBI agents, Reyes claimed that Papini planned “everything,” including the decision to use a wood-burning tool to brand her shoulder. He passed a polygraph test.

Keith’s lawyer told the docuseries that any allegations of “severe abuse, manipulation and lying” are false and “disproven by a mountain of documentary evidence and objective, indisputable facts.”

In the docuseries, Papini claimed that the descriptions she gave of the two masked Hispanic women were supposed to represent Reyes’ mother. She hoped investigators would use it to track down Reyes without her saying he abducted her. But Rittenmeyer told Papini that Reyes’ mother was Irish.

“OK. I’ve met her twice,” Papini responded. “It had very little to do with his mother and her ethnicity. It was about trying to get them to alert them to his identity without saying his name out loud. Quite frankly, I don’t give a f—k whether she’s Hispanic or not. It was about James. It wasn’t about her.”

Rittenmeyer said that the docuseries will detail “a specific personality disorder that she has.”

“I went into this understanding that the conventional wisdom about Sherri is that she’s a sociopath, a narcissist who faked a hoax kidnapping to get attention,” said Rittenmeyer.

“[But]… there are certain ways that Sherri’s personality manifests that are very theatrical and can feel performative. And so, given what we understand about her, I think it’s basic human nature to be incredibly skeptical. I did not trust anything she said to me. If she told me my mother loved me, I was going to get a second and third source because, even as her lawyer says, she’s a convicted liar.”
At every step, she makes it worse. She tried to frame Reyes' mother with a felony (in effort to track down Reyes who Papini herself recruited to help her hide) - and used a description of a Hispanic woman when Reyes' mother is Irish.

Good one, Sherri.

I cringe for anyone going forward who has to deal with her. imo


jmopinion
 
  • #150

5/24/25

When questioned by FBI agents, Reyes claimed that Papini planned “everything,” including the decision to use a wood-burning tool to brand her shoulder. He passed a polygraph test.

Keith’s lawyer told the docuseries that any allegations of “severe abuse, manipulation and lying” are false and “disproven by a mountain of documentary evidence and objective, indisputable facts.”

In the docuseries, Papini claimed that the descriptions she gave of the two masked Hispanic women were supposed to represent Reyes’ mother. She hoped investigators would use it to track down Reyes without her saying he abducted her. But Rittenmeyer told Papini that Reyes’ mother was Irish.

“OK. I’ve met her twice,” Papini responded. “It had very little to do with his mother and her ethnicity. It was about trying to get them to alert them to his identity without saying his name out loud. Quite frankly, I don’t give a f—k whether she’s Hispanic or not. It was about James. It wasn’t about her.”

Rittenmeyer said that the docuseries will detail “a specific personality disorder that she has.”

“I went into this understanding that the conventional wisdom about Sherri is that she’s a sociopath, a narcissist who faked a hoax kidnapping to get attention,” said Rittenmeyer.

“[But]… there are certain ways that Sherri’s personality manifests that are very theatrical and can feel performative. And so, given what we understand about her, I think it’s basic human nature to be incredibly skeptical. I did not trust anything she said to me. If she told me my mother loved me, I was going to get a second and third source because, even as her lawyer says, she’s a convicted liar.”
That's BS because she has a history in high school of racism against Hispanics. How would authorities know that "Hispanic women" meant James Reyes??? They wouldn't have. And... his mother is Irish, so so much for her explanation.
 
  • #151
At every step, she makes it worse. She tried to frame Reyes' mother with a felony (in effort to track down Reyes who Papini herself recruited to help her hide) - and used a description of a Hispanic woman when Reyes' mother is Irish.

Good one, Sherri.

I cringe for anyone going forward who has to deal with her. imo


jmopinion
She’s a nightmare that never ends. Anyone she ever associates with is touched by her insanity. Unbelievable the lengths she goes too.

I keep saying this, but it’s always at top of mind for me. She should never, ever, now or twenty years from now - be allowed to be near her children.
 
  • #152
Just when you think she can't get any lower she starts to dig
 
  • #153
@Seattle1 - when you get a chance - can you see if there are any updates - hearings/trial - yet? TIA! :)
 
  • #154

Case Information​

22FL-0199572 | PAPINI vs. PAPIN

08/14/2025 *Trial: Short Cause
Original Type
*Trial: Short Cause

Judicial Officer
Barton, Kathryn J

Hearing Time
8:30 AM

Result
Held


Parties Present
Petitioner (Plaintiff): PAPINI, KEITH

Attorney: Manuel, Conard Manuel and Tescher

Respondent (Defendant): PAPINI, SHERRI

Attorney: KINNEY & KINNEY


@Niner - last event held was 8/14/24 and nothing on the calendar.
 
  • #155
Will Sherri still be like this in her 50's? 60's? 70's? Still the cute little blonde (well, blonde anyway) playing merry hell with the lives of everyone she meets? Going to court to demand to see her grandchildren? The mind boggles. And will there be anyone who cares?
 
  • #156
Will Sherri still be like this in her 50's? 60's? 70's? Still the cute little blonde (well, blonde anyway) playing merry hell with the lives of everyone she meets? Going to court to demand to see her grandchildren? The mind boggles. And will there be anyone who cares?
I hope her children are fully informed of her antics when they reach adulthood because once her looks fade and she can't easily find a man to take her in, she might con her own children for monetary support, housing, etc.

jmopinion
 
  • #157
Will Sherri still be like this in her 50's? 60's? 70's? Still the cute little blonde (well, blonde anyway) playing merry hell with the lives of everyone she meets? Going to court to demand to see her grandchildren? The mind boggles. And will there be anyone who cares?
Like a moth to a flame I think she is going to eventually try and manipulate someone who is going to take care of her in a brutal way. She doesnt exactly make good decisions.
 
  • #158
Just when you think she can't get any lower she starts to dig
I turned on 20/20 last night and there she was….oh heck no. She needs to go away. It was at the part where her husband finds out it was all a hoax. He broke my heart, but had to turn it off. 😎
 
  • #159
And will there be anyone who cares?
Ohhh I think as long as True Crime is still around someone will care. For better or worse, she's become an insatiable commodity we can't move on from.
 
  • #160
That's BS because she has a history in high school of racism against Hispanics. How would authorities know that "Hispanic women" meant James Reyes??? They wouldn't have. And... his mother is Irish, so so much for her explanation.
Yep, lying liar who lies habitually.
 

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
115
Guests online
2,749
Total visitors
2,864

Forum statistics

Threads
632,926
Messages
18,633,679
Members
243,342
Latest member
cece1070
Back
Top