• #721
Good that she was identified. Her Reconstruction looks like it was very accurate.
 
  • #722
  • #723
There is a real picture of her which would have probably helped identify her from after she was found. See Photo 1 within this link here: https://www.doenetwork.org/cases/software/main.html?id=1020ufca
Both of those are artist's renditions. The one on the left was created by me, using a coroner's photo that is not publicly available. The one on the right was done by the NCMEC, based on the post-embalming photo that the agency released to the public.
 
  • #724
Both of those are artist's renditions. The one on the left was created by me, using a coroner's photo that is not publicly available. The one on the right was done by the NCMEC, based on the post-embalming photo that the agency released to the public.

I think they were specifically referring to this crime scene photo which is linked on the Doe Network page and labeled “Photo” 1 in red text underneath the reconstructions (there’s some bloating but otherwise the face is recognizable): File:Ventura County Jane Doe (2).jpg - Wikimedia Commons
 
  • #725
Yep. That Photo was a good picture and not showing anything terrible. Better chance of identification if they had shared that instead of the quite bad cartoonish reconstructions.
 
  • #726
Yep. That Photo was a good picture and not showing anything terrible. Better chance of identification if they had shared that instead of the quite bad cartoonish reconstructions.

They did share it. That's why it is available to us, the public.
 
  • #727
May Maricela be at peace now.
 
  • #728
Today, March 12, 2026 is Maricela's 68th birthday.
 
  • #729
Happy heavenly birthday, Maricela!
 

Guardians Monthly Goal

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
102
Guests online
2,376
Total visitors
2,478

Forum statistics

Threads
646,314
Messages
18,857,345
Members
245,967
Latest member
Polly456
Top