Henry Lee- A Hired Gun and His Theories

[kevmob77]

Here is my own personal list of what excuses he will make to exonerate Casey Anthony. . Feel free to voice your opinions of him.

1.) Contaminated evidence at the scene
2.) Date of Caylee's death unknown
3.) Police contamination in general
4.) evidence too degraded

...the list can go on and on with Henry Lee.

 

[JBean]

feel free to voice your opinion about Lee. but keep it constructive and enough with the name calling.

 

[TxRose]

I respect Henry Lee's experience and knowledge, but I have been disappointed in his involvement in some other high profile cases. I believe him to be a typical "hired gun" that will spin the evidence (or lack thereof) to defend the position that he has been hired to support. All you have to do is look at the OJ case to see what I mean.

He has jumped into most of the high profile cases...so it is no surprise to me that he would jump at the chance to be part of this one. Look at the huge media blitz this case has seen.

 

[chicagofa13]

He used to do such good work for victims when he worked for the gov. Now he is just looking for a buck, IMO. And hearing Kathy Reichs is involved too, sheesh, I thought she was above this cr*p.

 

[scandi]

Hi JBean :blowkiss: It's great to see you so involved here because you are a natural ;}

And Thanks Kevmob for the OP. Velly Intellesting as Mr Lee would say.

The cases he has been involved in that I have read about, both Peterson cases both from about 4 years ago, were so Circumstantial in nature. That meant there was a great push to discredit evidence to lessen the preponderance of it IMO, and I am not a legal expert.

And so much of what the prosecutor had going in at least Scott Peterson's case, had problems. I think the State needed every bit of what they thought was stellar or court worthy evidence to stand in.


In prosecuting Casey for Caylee's murder I don't think Mr Lee could make a big enough of a dent to side-rail evidence. I haven't really studied this case. but from the little I have read about it think there is going to be enough worthy evidence to outweigh anything that could be put out there by an expert criminologist.

Not 100% of course, but way up there - maybe 93%.

Scandi

 

[Anais]

Hi Everyone!

H. Lee will say that the officers either planted evidence or tampered with it.

 

[kevmob77]

Here is my own personal list of what excuses he will make to exonerate Casey Anthony. . Feel free to voice your opinions of him.

1.) Contaminated evidence at the scene
2.) Date of Caylee's death unknown
3.) Police contamination in general
4.) evidence too degraded

...the list can go on and on with Henry Lee.

Sorry about that JBean...

As for Henry Lee, I cannot understand why any defendant or lawyer would want his "expertise". From OJ on, he has been associated with guilt and an expert on how to muddle evidence (always for the defense, coincidentally) so that it will confuse potential jurors. Here is an article from the Phil Spector trial where Lee's credibility was questioned:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/co...lity_challenged_in_phil_spector_murder_trial/

 

[starpatch]

Lee was caught several years ago in some Lab chicannery, and, too bad, I cannot remember what it was.


I do not trust the man, he just goes for the gold..$$$$$$$$$

 

[Cher352]

I don't like any of the "experts" defense is using.

They may be experts but from what I have seen of Lee, Badin and W in the past is they will always make it appear to favor whoever is paying them. There appears to be no scruples in any of them to the length they will go and the tricks they will pull.

Personally if I was on a jury using them I would only trust the county, state of FBI personel.

 

[JBean]

Sorry about that JBean...

As for Henry Lee, I cannot understand why any defendant or lawyer would want his "expertise". From OJ on, he has been associated with guilt and an expert on how to muddle evidence (always for the defense, coincidentally) so that it will confuse potential jurors. Here is an article from the Phil Spector trial where Lee's credibility was questioned:

http://www.boston.com/news/local/co...lity_challenged_in_phil_spector_murder_trial/

You're a good sport kevmob..thanks.

 

[BostonSu]

I think the defense will try to show that it's possible the evidence was compromised, either before or after discovery. I'm also pretty sure we'll be hearing the Zanni story more, too.

I think though, that OCSO has been so dilgent, and methodical that they will prove this case, beyond ANY doubt.

 

[scandi]

I just heard on FOX that the defense team with Henry Lee are about to visit the Anthony home and the spot where the body was found.

 

[JBean]

I just heard on FOX that the defense team with Henry Lee are about to visit the Anthony home and the spot where the body was found.

Hi Scandi, it is so good to see you here. :blowkisslease post any developments you may hear.

 

[Valrico Analyzer]

WTF!!! TODD BLACK IS THE "A" FAMILY SPOKESMAN AGAIN!!!

per fox news..yep

 

[MaedchenX]

WTF!!! TODD BLACK IS THE "A" FAMILY SPOKESMAN AGAIN!!!

per fox news..yep

:bang:

No more MB? Is this an upgrade or downgrade in representation, I just can't tell.

 

[luvbeaches]

I personally believe Casey's fingerprint (and/or palmprint) will be on the duct tape and the plastic bag (possibly inside and outside). Henry Lee can say what he wants, but if these two things are present, nothing he says will help Casey.

And if you combine this with everything else we know, I believe she's guilty of killing Caylee. What I don't know is if it was accidental (however, drugging and duct taping her mouth shut would hardly be considered accidental, IMO) or intentional. I also have a feeling there's going to be a lot of info that comes out during the trial that leaves no doubt that Casey killed Caylee.

 

[scandi]

Hi Scandi, it is so good to see you here. :blowkisslease post any developments you may hear.

Hi JBean, I will as I will be home most of the day and it looks like the case is very alive with new info.

I also have to say how impressed with the last WFTV article I read. A Sleuther's dream for those little 'keeper' gold nuggets. xox

 

[ajurk]

i think he'll use the if the glove doesnt fit you must acquit...

anyways, from what i recall didnt he confuse the jurors in the OJ case so badly that most of them ignored the dna evidence because they could not understand it? and i know that his creditbility has been questioned in the past...

im just hoping that the same thing wont happen again with this case (confusion about dna) but i can see that happening. i can see the, it was a dead pig in the trunk arguement right now. kobi has mentioned that on NG before...

 

[scandi]

I personally believe Casey's fingerprint (and/or palmprint) will be on the duct tape and the plastic bag (possibly inside and outside). Henry Lee can say what he wants, but if these two things are present, nothing he says will help Casey.

And if you combine this with everything else we know, I believe she's guilty of killing Caylee. What I don't know is if it was accidental or intentional. I also have a feeling there's going to be a lot of info that comes out during the trial that's leaves no doubt that Casey killed Caylee.

Hi ya Luvbeaches,

I think you are right on about the fingerprints, and wonder what angle Mr Lee will come from.

Dog hair, lint or fibers and anything else possible found on the duct tape that leads back to the Anthony home wouldn't necessarily show Casey as the killer or one who prepared her for disposal IMO. There were several people living in and frequenting that home.

The video on Channel 6 that told of clothes being found very near the skull is very important, and since Casey had said SS to the clothes not being found, this could tie her to the crime IMO.

I bet she never dreamed this bag would surface and circumstances prevail that would lead to the clothes floating out of the bag to then lie in bright sunlight to be found. It could even be what drew attention to the bag by the man who found Caylee. xox

 

[luvbeaches]

i think he'll use the if the glove doesnt fit you must acquit...

anyways, from what i recall didnt he confuse the jurors in the OJ case so badly that most of them ignored the dna evidence because they could not understand it? and i know that his creditbility has been questioned in the past...

im just hoping that the same thing wont happen again with this case (confusion about dna) but i can see that happening. i can see the, it was a dead pig in the trunk arguement right now. kobi has mentioned that on NG before...

I think all he does is confuse the jurors. Remember the case where he spit the ketchup out his mouth to show blood spatter patterns?