MA - Professor Karen Read, 43, charged with murdering police officer boyfriend John O'Keefe by hitting him with car, Canton, 14 Apr 2023 #20 Retrial

Status
Not open for further replies.
  • #961
I will attempt to discuss this tonight on Websleuths YouTube Live at 10:30 PM Eastern
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #962
I was also moved by Peggy O'Keefe on the stand. She's a mother who has buried two of her children. And had to explain to, and hold up two grieving grandchildren also. I am very thankful that the defense team chose not to cross exam her testimony. They showed respect.

In saying this, I was also taken by surprise when Peggy stated loudly in court that she exclaimed loudly in the hospital corridors " WHAT IS SHE DOING HERE ?" in a menacing tone ....referring to Karen Read...who was her son's girlfriend, who was also grieving.... It just solidified to me....that there was more than likely no love lost when it came to KR and Peggy OK.

Just my two cents...

I’m also glad they did not cross her. She’s definitely been through a lot.

That said I was surprised she testified that the hospital told her Karen Read was there for a psych evaluation when she asked why she was there. I find it hard to believe hospital staff would have violated HIPAA law.
 
  • #963

To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

4/23/25​

A new voice is heard in the Karen Read trial: John O'Keefe's mother's​

 
  • #964
Is " not intentionally" the same as...." I didn't mean to do it"?

Ms Roberts was slayed on the stand, for lying to the Grand Jury.

And Judge Bev sighed...
" Next witness, Mr Brennan?"

Am I missing something? OK, maybe not perjury as I am hearing, but whatever happened to impeaching a witness. Did the defense not accomplish that?
 
  • #965
  • #966
Interesting that Karen Read knew that John was out in the cold without a coat for many hours.

And the defense twisted KerR's testimony about a lie.


For the record, KerR did not admit to lying. There’s no perjury here, folks.

She had no intent to mislead, said KerR.

Please keep facts in order.

Defense (especially Jackson) likes to twist a witness' words up to benefit his client, the defendant and discredit the witness.

KerR remains a powerful witness. moo
 
  • #967
Wasn't that intense little discussion with Kerry R. earlier today/trial, about her saying she never heard that asked at all, earlier trial, she said she DID hear it asked by Karen?
Don't forget Kerry R admitted in her testimony today that her and Jen Mccabe got together to go over their timeline. So basically they are cooborating each other's story. Why is the question? Their hiding something and protecting each other. I don't trust anything that comes out of McCabes mouth. Her 7 calls to John shows flirtatious behavior that IMO could have caused a jealous husband to act like Mike Tyson that night.
 
  • #968
Having just started to get into the details of this case, I can honestly say I don't know what happened.
There is so much to absorb.
It is troubling to hear Kerry Roberts change her statement, but does it prove Karen's innocence? Not necessarily IMO. What it may prove is reasonable doubt, and that is what really matters.
With your help, those just now starting in on the details will be able to comprehend all the evidence presented. Since many of you have been following the Read case since the beginning, your help is greatly appreciated.
Thank you.
Tricia
 
  • #969
Jen McCabe must be scared to death of Jackson crossing her.
 
  • #970
  • #971
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.
 
  • #972
He is a bully and it's not working in his favor this trial.

I think he’s much tamer this trial and has really highlighted the shortcomings in the CW witness testimony thus far
 
  • #973
 
  • #974

Kerry should be more concerned why her cronies were too busy calling in favors to deflect any spotlight on them and their partying ways so much so that it debilitated the investigation into JOK death to such an extent that no one will truly know what happened and no justice will ever be served.
 
  • #975
I think he’s much tamer this trial and has really highlighted the shortcomings in the CW witness testimony thus far
I agree. Hands down I would rather have someone as smart as him defending me. He is a super talented lawyer .
 
  • #976
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

4/23/25

Why Wasn't John O'Keefe Seen On The Lawn? | Vinnie Politan Investigates​


00:00 Why Wasn't John O'Keefe Seen on the Lawn? | Vinnie Politan Investigates
04:47 What Do These Text Messages Prove?
14:42 Why Did The Brians Destroy Their Phones?
26:27 Why Didn't Anyone See John O'Keefe On The Lawn?
37:36 How Different Will Openings Be?
 
  • #977
  • #978
To view this content we will need your consent to set third party cookies.
For more detailed information, see our cookies page.

4/23/25

Why Wasn't John O'Keefe Seen On The Lawn? | Vinnie Politan Investigates​


00:00 Why Wasn't John O'Keefe Seen on the Lawn? | Vinnie Politan Investigates
04:47 What Do These Text Messages Prove?
14:42 Why Did The Brians Destroy Their Phones?
26:27 Why Didn't Anyone See John O'Keefe On The Lawn?
37:36 How Different Will Openings Be?

There is no way that all those people could have missed him if he was there. This is 34 Fairview at night.
 
  • #979
He is a bully and it's not working in his favor this trial.
Out of 3 prosecution witnesses so far, he's completely discredited 2 of them (and he didn't cross the 3rd). I'd say it's definitely working in his (and his client's) favor.
 
  • #980
I was also moved by Peggy O'Keefe on the stand. She's a mother who has buried two of her children. And had to explain to, and hold up two grieving grandchildren also. I am very thankful that the defense team chose not to cross exam her testimony. They showed respect.

In saying this, I was also taken by surprise when Peggy stated loudly in court that she exclaimed loudly in the hospital corridors " WHAT IS SHE DOING HERE ?" in a menacing tone ....referring to Karen Read...who was her son's girlfriend, who was also grieving.... It just solidified to me....that there was more than likely no love lost when it came to KR and Peggy OK.

Just my two cents...

It was a very condescending tone. Re: “what is she doing here”. My response to that would be ‘why wouldn’t she be here’? They are dating and in an exclusive relationship. She was in John’s house.

It’s apparent from that statement that Peggy didn’t approve of KR.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Members online

Online statistics

Members online
124
Guests online
3,014
Total visitors
3,138

Forum statistics

Threads
632,988
Messages
18,634,555
Members
243,363
Latest member
Pawsitive
Back
Top