The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.Incorrect. The multiple alleged victims are witnesses and witness testimony is evidence.
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.Incorrect. The multiple alleged victims are witnesses and witness testimony is evidence.
In this case unfortunately all other supposed witnesses claim to not recall anything about the incident.
Feinstein, who represents California and who is the ranking Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, had received the letter from Ford sometime over the summer and was asked to keep it confidential. At some point, however, the letter was leaked to the press, although Feinstein denies that anyone in her office is responsible.
This reeks of enabling. Well, if the FBI isn't going to be able to look into how his drinking plays into this, let's hope those closest to BK plan an intervention if those closest to him deem it necessary.
Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser
I really would like to know if someone from Senator Feinstein's office leaked the letter. How can she be so sure that no one did?
Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.
The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.
Uncorroborated evidence is weak evidence in my opinion.The witnesses Ford claims were at the party deny knowing about the party or being there. Her good friend denies ever meeting Judge K.
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.
No, that’s literally NOT the definition of mainstream news, coolj. Lol. Maybe that’s why there’s so much confusion. Do people really not know what it is?
It’s not one extreme or the other.
Which moderate, mostly slightly left or right leaning sources did you read?
They’re the most fair, unbiased and factual. THOSE are mainstream media sources.
Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser
I really would like to know if someone from Senator Feinstein's office leaked the letter. How can she be so sure that no one did?
Cotton says Feinstein will be investigated over leaked letter by Kavanaugh accuser
Uncorroborated evidence is weak evidence in my opinion.
Why do you believe Feinstein’s office might be the leaker? Honest question.
Did he forget? Very strange. One would think a Yale graduate would be common knowledge in the family.
I said "all other" clearly meaning other than the accuser's. All other people who were supposed to have been at the party claim they don't recall. Yes, you have accuser's testimony that is considered evidence. But without corroborating witnesses, it's he said, she said.Incorrect. The multiple alleged victims are witnesses and witness testimony is evidence.
With the multitude of drunk parties, I imagine it is hard to remember a particular party if they were not the one assaulted.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.