minor4th
Verified Attorney
- Joined
- Jan 14, 2013
- Messages
- 8,152
- Reaction score
- 2,110
I was referring to this post you made.
BBM 1: Here you say that Van Staden was not on Motha's photo because the photos were not taken at the same time and even though both times are the same those photos could have been taken almost a minute apart.
BBM 2: Yet here you say that the fact that things look the same in both Van S. and Motha's images prove the pictures were taken at the same time.
You can't have it both ways.
By your own reasoning one can then just as easily say Motha's photos could have been taken shortly after Van Staden took his.
What I meant was that Motha and Van Staden were both taking photos of the crime scene during the same time period. Maybe seconds apart, maybe a minute apart - but they were both there in the bathroom and the hallway and the bedroom during the same time period when Van Staden was supposed to have been alone.