SouthAussie
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Aug 9, 2012
- Messages
- 29,212
- Reaction score
- 175,173
I think the police are sticking to an agenda that they had in April 2015, being, if BS is convicted of the historical charges, they will build a circumstantial case that BS ( a convicted paedophile ) was due at Benaroon Dr. when WT disappeared. If they can't get up a case that the DPP will accept, they may hand it to the coroner who may make recommendations about further investigating BS. MOO
I am wondering, if BS is found not guilty in his trials and all reporting on the cases is suppressed so the public do not know how the jury may have arrived at that conclusion, what percentage of people do you think will accept the verdict and treat him like a not guilty person in his day to day life?
I'm not sure that all the reporting will be indefinitely suppressed. IIRC the request was to suppress the reporting in the first trial, so as not to jeopardise the result of the 2nd trial.
The journos are sitting in listening and recording, waiting for sub judice and suppression to be lifted.