Olive may have a point. .. but even if this is the case, the reason we should care who the father is that you would think that in a missing child case paternity would want to be established.
Any and all people having a vested interest in this child would be intereviewed or concerned about her whereabouts.
My guess is that Jesse G. confirmed to the police he is not the child's father otherwise they would have identified him and no longer believe the dead father story. Jesse is an active participant in this given his change to the timeline, his role as fiance and his families role as past babysitters.
If one of my children and they are grown now was missing I would be in contact with EVERYONE who had anything to do with them, including biological fathers and step fathers and anyone who once cared or should have cared.
I think it's relevant. . . I also think that the LE believing the father is dead, effective rules out Jesse as they have had contact with him in various forms.
Soooo deductive reasoning if he is dead and this woman has had a myspace and facebook page for a few years why does no one ever mention his death? Did he not have family that perhaps woulld be interested in their dead son's child? Or were they not aware.
Thanks for the response Saqqara! I understand wanting to know about Jesse and agree with that. He is involved here, no question about it. And I agree about "any and all having an interest" I guess I just accepted that the biodad's family did not have an interest and has probably never seen Caylee. I have been known to jump to conclusions from time to time :crazy: The fact that biodad and his accident were never mentioned on Casey's myspace kind of led me to think along the lines of Olive's comments above or just that the biodad never told his parents, never acknowledged the baby, maybe never acknowledged Casey.
Salem