The detective said he didn't know about it. But I think the first responding officers did. LE's actions support Cindy's story imo.They did not care about the car at all, based on their actions, so why would Cindy think any differently?She had already stated on record that the car smelled like a dead body. Her gdaughter was missing. She later said she did it with the blessing of LE. LE said they were not informed she had done this until 8-4 or 8-5. She said the car smelled of a dead body when she was worried about her GD's whereabouts. How could she not know not to wash the pants?
Cindy told LE about the car smell, the officer went into the car after she reported it and apparently didn't even give it any merit. It is not mentioned in the police report, they did not take the car for 24-48 hours,the detective in the bond hearing said someone said something about a smell so they checked it out 2 days after it was reported. (ETA but the fact is we know it had already been checked out by the responding officer)When the detective did go check it out, they simply asked George if they could impound the car and he said yes.
So, LE didn't make much of the smell or they would have asked Cindy or George if they could impound the car ASAP. So why would Cindy think LE was interested in the car or the pants at all? Nothing they did suggested that they had any interest in the vehicle or its contents whatsoever. Why would LE risk losing valubale evidence in the form of decomp smell coming from a trunk by waiting 24-48 hours to examine it? Espcially when they had George and Cindy would offering the car and anything else up for scrutiny?
LE was not interested in that car until the 17th and I do not know why that is.