Pattymarie
Active Member
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2008
- Messages
- 2,102
- Reaction score
- 0
Am I missing something here? I thought, per Dr. G, that this was all released a long time ago. Are we expecting something new?
Am I missing something here? I thought, per Dr. G, that this was all released a long time ago. Are we expecting something new?
My point is, the state is the accuser. They should be required to give the accused what they have without charge. Why should the defense be required to pay for what the state is required to present at trial? Why should they have to put out that kind of money before they can even prepare the defense? Then there is the issue of duplicating many pages, so they are charged twice for nothing. The fee is clearly much higher than true copy costs too.
It reminds me of a Freedom of information request I made in my state. I was charge nearly $100 for less than a dozen pages. Their excuse? There was no one available other than a doctor to pull the info out of the computer and click print. Yeah, right!
http://www.clickorlando.com/news/19724459/detail.html
Translation: They don't want the public to know the truth about what was done to Caylee. Plain and simple.
Aren't autopsys available in all criminal investigations?
everything the SA/LE does causes them "anguish"---they don't want anything released except their version.....
When I hear or read the phrase "The Anthony's Want", I want to go POSTAL. They lost their right to "want" anything when they chose KC over innocent Caylee! IMHO
The notice of supplimental discovery was on June 8 and the motion to restrict disclosure was filed on the 10th so it hasn't been long at all. A better question, I have raised before, is why did it take them so long to release it. December is a long time ago.
Perhaps the reason they object is because they know how likely it is that the reporting and talk on line about it will be greatly embellished; little details added like the black band of death on the hair, among others, that aren't there in print. It amazes me how many things are stated as fact that simply are not, or at least have not been disclosed officially, if they are true.
OK wow....perhaps I have lost my perspective, but I think they have a good case for having the results sealed.
Maybe I have just had enough with this case...TMI I guess. But nothing about this child's earthly remains has been given any respect...what will it hurt to give what's left a little dignity??
Brad Conway is not a member of the defense team, and Cindy and George Anthony are not the defendants. They are material witnesses in a murder trial and therefore their emotional upheaval about material evidence is noted, but should not sway the carriage of justice in following the laws of Florida regarding discovery material.
--------
Yeah they do, they want Casey released. I truly feel that they know that Casey murdered Caylee but they really do not want her to have to pay for her crime. She never has paid for what she has done and the Anthonys really just want her to be released and they can all go about their lives as if Caylee never had lived.
I agree. I really think there is going to be saliva or some other biological evidence on the sticky side of the tape. I have a feeling the tape is going to yield evidence that proves Caylee was ALIVE when that duct tape was placed over her mouth.
The release of the autopsy results will have just the opposite affect. With the actual results available, it will end speculation and online discussion, as well as person to person conversation regarding this case, will discuss factual evidence, not speculative evidence.